» Articles » PMID: 27536482

Cost Analysis of an Office-based Surgical Suite

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Aug 19
PMID 27536482
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Operating costs are a significant part of delivering surgical care. Having a system to analyze these costs is imperative for decision making and efficiency. We present an analysis of surgical supply, labor and administrative costs, and remuneration of procedures as a means for a practice to analyze their cost effectiveness; this affects the quality of care based on the ability to provide services. The costs of surgical care cannot be estimated blindly as reconstructive and cosmetic procedures have different percentages of overhead.

Methods: A detailed financial analysis of office-based surgical suite costs for surgical procedures was determined based on company contract prices and average use of supplies. The average time spent on scheduling, prepping, and doing the surgery was factored using employee rates.

Results: The most expensive, minor procedure supplies are suture needles. The 4 most common procedures from the most expensive to the least are abdominoplasty, breast augmentation, facelift, and lipectomy.

Conclusions: Reconstructive procedures require a greater portion of collection to cover costs. Without the adjustment of both patient and insurance remuneration in the practice, the ability to provide quality care will be increasingly difficult.

Citing Articles

Wide-Awake Hand Surgery Has Its Benefits: A Study of 1,011 Patients.

McKnight K, Smith V, MacFadden L, Chong A, Van Demark Jr R J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022; 4(6):394-398.

PMID: 36425372 PMC: 9678697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.05.008.


Precaution Costs: The Presumption of Breast Cancer Seeding and Its Impact on Surgical Expenditure.

Caudill A, Newman A, Davison S Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8(6):e2903.

PMID: 32766056 PMC: 7339331. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002903.


Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Curlin J, Herman C Surg J (N Y). 2020; 6(2):e87-e97.

PMID: 32577527 PMC: 7305019. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710529.


SSET Project: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Surgical Specialty Emergency Trays in the Emergency Department.

Humphries L, Shenaq D, Teven C, Park J, Song D Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6(1):e1591.

PMID: 29464153 PMC: 5811283. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001591.


Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Kuyucu E, Erdil M, Kara A, Bulbul M SICOT J. 2017; 3:46.

PMID: 28664842 PMC: 5492787. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017022.


References
1.
Lee M, Zwiebel S, Guyuron B . Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: a guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(4):769-776. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a01457. View

2.
Ginsburg M, Kravitz R, Sandberg W . A survey of physician attitudes and practices concerning cost-effectiveness in patient care. West J Med. 2000; 173(6):390-4. PMC: 1071190. DOI: 10.1136/ewjm.173.6.390. View

3.
Ziolkowski N, Voineskos S, Ignacy T, Thoma A . Systematic review of economic evaluations in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(1):191-203. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8f8. View

4.
Marcus J, Tyrone J, Few J, Fine N, Mustoe T . Optimization of conscious sedation in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(5):1338-45. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199910000-00015. View

5.
Rosenblatt W, Chavez A, Tenney D, Silverman D . Assessment of the economic impact of an overage reduction program in the operating room. J Clin Anesth. 1997; 9(6):478-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00104-9. View