» Articles » PMID: 23783064

Frequency of the Preoperative Flaws and Commonly Required Maneuvers to Correct Them: a Guide to Reducing the Revision Rhinoplasty Rate

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Jun 21
PMID 23783064
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the most common deformities seen preoperatively in secondary rhinoplasty patients and the required surgical maneuvers to correct them.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients was performed. Preoperative variables included demographics, prior rhinoplasty data, main aesthetic/functional concerns, and the senior author's physical examination of the nose. Details of the operative maneuvers were reviewed.

Results: The average patient age was 39.2 years. All patients had previous rhinoplasties performed by other surgeons. The most common preoperative complaints were airway occlusion (65 percent), dorsum asymmetry (33 percent), nostril asymmetry (18 percent), and tip asymmetry (14 percent). The most common preoperative nasal deformities seen by the senior author (B.G.) were dorsal asymmetry (65 percent), wide dorsum (47 percent), nostril asymmetry (41 percent), wide alar base (38 percent), and dorsal hump (30 percent). The senior author saw significantly more nasal deformities than the patients themselves, especially in the following areas: dorsal asymmetry (65 percent versus 33 percent; p = 0.0002), wide dorsum (47 percent versus 13 percent; p < 0.0001), nostril asymmetry (41 percent versus 18 percent; p = 0.0003), wide alar base (38 percent versus 6 percent; p < 0.0001), dorsal hump (30 percent versus 9 percent; p < 0.0001), and columella protrusion (25 percent versus 6 percent; p = 0.0002). The most common revision rhinoplasty surgical maneuvers were septoplasty (71 percent), alar rim graft (67 percent), dorsal graft (63 percent), osteotomy (60 percent), and dorsal hump removal (46 percent).

Conclusions: The high incidence of airway concerns among secondary rhinoplasty patients is alarming and emphasizes the urgent need to pay attention to the airway during primary rhinoplasty. There is often a disparity between what the patient sees and what the surgeon observes.

Citing Articles

Awareness of rhinoplasty surgery among the population in the Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.

Khawaji N, Mokarbesh H, Kariri K, Dallak F, Othathi F, Hakami A J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(9):4008-4015.

PMID: 39464948 PMC: 11504772. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_463_24.


Lessons from Self-Assessment of Post-Rhinoplasty Complaints; Analysis of 192 Candidates of Secondary Rhinoplasty.

Loghmani S, Loghmani A, Loghmani S, Zarei M, Maraki F World J Plast Surg. 2023; 12(1):12-19.

PMID: 37220575 PMC: 10200093. DOI: 10.52547/wjps.12.1.12.


Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors.

Alsubeeh N, AlSaqr M, Alkarzae M, Aldosari B Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 41(1):59.

PMID: 31879662 PMC: 6904703. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-019-0237-x.


Introduction of a Less Invasive Revision Rhinoplasty Using Closed Nasal Chondrotome.

Manafi A, Hamedi Z, Manfai F World J Plast Surg. 2019; 8(1):108-111.

PMID: 30873371 PMC: 6409145. DOI: 10.29252/wjps.8.1.108.


Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.

Bouaoud J, Loustau M, Belloc J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6(9):e1884.

PMID: 30349780 PMC: 6191217. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001884.