» Articles » PMID: 27534769

Peri-implant Osseointegration After Low-level Laser Therapy: Micro-computed Tomography and Resonance Frequency Analysis in an Animal Model

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Aug 19
PMID 27534769
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy on the osseointegration process by comparing resonance frequency analysis measurements performed at implant placement and after 30 days and micro-computed tomography images in irradiated vs nonirradiated rabbits. Fourteen male New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups of seven animals each, one control group (nonirradiated animals) and one experimental group that received low-level laser therapy (Thera Lase®, aluminum-gallium-arsenide laser diode, 10 J per spot, two spots per session, seven sessions, 830 nm, 50 mW, CW, Ø 0.0028 cm). The mandibular left incisor was surgically extracted in all animals, and one osseointegrated implant was placed immediately afterward (3.25ø × 11.5 mm; NanoTite, BIOMET 3i). Resonance frequency analysis was performed with the Osstell® device at implant placement and at 30 days (immediately before euthanasia). Micro-computed tomography analyses were then conducted using a high-resolution scanner (SkyScan 1172 X-ray Micro-CT) to evaluate the amount of newly formed bone around the implants. Irradiated animals showed significantly higher implant stability quotients at 30 days (64.286 ± 1.596; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 60.808-67.764) than controls (56.357 ± 1.596; 95 %CI 52.879-59.835) (P = .000). The percentage of newly formed bone around the implants was also significantly higher in irradiated animals (75.523 ± 8.510; 95 %CI 61.893-89.155) than in controls (55.012 ± 19.840; 95 %CI 41.380-68.643) (P = .027). Laser therapy, based on the irradiation protocol used in this study, was able to provide greater implant stability and increase the volume of peri-implant newly formed bone, indicating that laser irradiation effected an improvement in the osseointegration process.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation With Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Implant Stability Quotient at Different Time Intervals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shenoy A, Ganapathy D, Maiti S Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52160.

PMID: 38344646 PMC: 10859061. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52160.


Effect of LED photobiomodulation on dental implant osseointegration: An in vivo study.

Foletti J, Remy F, Chevenement L, Sterba M, Tavitian P, Badih L J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023; 17(1):28-34.

PMID: 37650019 PMC: 10462914. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2023.36954.


Photobiomodulation-Based Synergic Effects of Pt-Coated TiO Nanotubes and 850 nm Near-Infrared Irradiation on the Osseointegration Enhancement: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.

Moon K, Bae J, Park Y, Choi E, Oh S Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37110962 PMC: 10142112. DOI: 10.3390/nano13081377.


The Influence of Low-Level Laser Therapy on CBCT Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles of Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case-Control Study.

Attia M, Elewa G, Abdelgawad N, Ismail R, Hassan Eid M, Ghoneim M Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36559.

PMID: 37102010 PMC: 10123229. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36559.


Rehabilitation of Atrophic Mandible with Ultrashort Implants Combined with Photobiomodulation Therapy: A Split-Mouth Design Study.

Zayed S, Noureldin M Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022; 10(3):198-206.

PMID: 36247059 PMC: 9555047. DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_635_21.


References
1.
Park J, Ahn S, Kang Y, Kim E, Heo J, Kang K . Effects of increased low-level diode laser irradiation time on extraction socket healing in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 30(2):719-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1402-6. View

2.
Chen S, Buser D . Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:186-215. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3. View

3.
Muller F . Interventions for edentate elders--what is the evidence?. Gerodontology. 2014; 31 Suppl 1:44-51. DOI: 10.1111/ger.12083. View

4.
Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D . Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 26(1):e1-7. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12315. View

5.
Ohta K, Takechi M, Minami M, Shigeishi H, Hiraoka M, Nishimura M . Influence of factors related to implant stability detected by wireless resonance frequency analysis device. J Oral Rehabil. 2009; 37(2):131-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02032.x. View