» Articles » PMID: 27502180

Imaging-genomics Reveals Driving Pathways of MRI Derived Volumetric Tumor Phenotype Features in Glioblastoma

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Aug 10
PMID 27502180
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors exhibit strong phenotypic differences that can be quantified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the underlying biological drivers of these imaging phenotypes remain largely unknown. An Imaging-Genomics analysis was performed to reveal the mechanistic associations between MRI derived quantitative volumetric tumor phenotype features and molecular pathways.

Methods: One hundred fourty one patients with presurgery MRI and survival data were included in our analysis. Volumetric features were defined, including the necrotic core (NE), contrast-enhancement (CE), abnormal tumor volume assessed by post-contrast T1w (tumor bulk or TB), tumor-associated edema based on T2-FLAIR (ED), and total tumor volume (TV), as well as ratios of these tumor components. Based on gene expression where available (n = 91), pathway associations were assessed using a preranked gene set enrichment analysis. These results were put into context of molecular subtypes in GBM and prognostication.

Results: Volumetric features were significantly associated with diverse sets of biological processes (FDR < 0.05). While NE and TB were enriched for immune response pathways and apoptosis, CE was associated with signal transduction and protein folding processes. ED was mainly enriched for homeostasis and cell cycling pathways. ED was also the strongest predictor of molecular GBM subtypes (AUC = 0.61). CE was the strongest predictor of overall survival (C-index = 0.6; Noether test, p = 4x10(-4)).

Conclusion: GBM volumetric features extracted from MRI are significantly enriched for information about the biological state of a tumor that impacts patient outcomes. Clinical decision-support systems could exploit this information to develop personalized treatment strategies on the basis of noninvasive imaging.

Citing Articles

Prognostic value of FDX1, the cuprotosis key gene, and its prediction models across imaging modalities and histology.

Yue Q, Zhang M, Jiang W, Gao L, Ye R, Hong J BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1381.

PMID: 39528953 PMC: 11552402. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13149-x.


Clustering Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Series in Glioblastoma Characterization: A Review of the Evolution, Applications, and Potentials.

De Simone M, Iaconetta G, Palermo G, Fiorindi A, Schaller K, De Maria L Brain Sci. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38539683 PMC: 10968478. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14030296.


Immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme.

Luan J, Zhang D, Liu B, Yang A, Lv K, Hu P J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):107.

PMID: 38279111 PMC: 10821572. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04823-y.


A radiomics nomogram prediction for survival of patients with "driver gene-negative" lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD).

Guo Q, Yang H, Shan S, Chang D, Qiu L, Luo H Radiol Med. 2023; 128(6):714-725.

PMID: 37219740 PMC: 10264479. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01643-4.


The peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: where we are and where we are going.

Giambra M, Di Cristofori A, Valtorta S, Manfrellotti R, Bigiogera V, Basso G J Neurosci Res. 2022; 101(2):199-216.

PMID: 36300592 PMC: 10091804. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25134.


References
1.
Gutman D, Cooper L, Hwang S, Holder C, Gao J, Aurora T . MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology. 2013; 267(2):560-9. PMC: 3632807. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120118. View

2.
Thakkar J, Dolecek T, Horbinski C, Ostrom Q, Lightner D, Barnholtz-Sloan J . Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23(10):1985-96. PMC: 4185005. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275. View

3.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, Gillette M . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. PMC: 1239896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. View

4.
Zinn P, Mahajan B, Majadan B, Sathyan P, Singh S, Majumder S . Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e25451. PMC: 3187774. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025451. View

5.
Diehn M, Nardini C, Wang D, McGovern S, Jayaraman M, Liang Y . Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(13):5213-8. PMC: 2278224. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801279105. View