What is the Contribution of Embryo-endometrial Asynchrony to Implantation Failure?

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2016 Aug 3

PMID 27480540

Citations 79

Authors

Wan-Tinn Teh

John McBain

Peter Rogers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The synchronized development of a viable embryo and a receptive endometrium is critical for successful implantation to take place. The aim of this paper is to review current thinking about the importance of embryo-endometrial synchrony in in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods: Detailed review of the literature on embryo-endometrial synchrony.

Results: By convention, the time when the blastocyst first attaches and starts to invade into the endometrium has been defined as the 'window of implantation'. The term window of implantation can be misleading when it is used to imply that there is a single critical window in time that determines whether implantation will be successful or not. Embryo maturation and endometrial development are two independent continuous processes. Implantation occurs when the two tissues fuse and pregnancy is established. A key concept in understanding this event is developmental 'synchrony', defined as when the early embryo and the uterus are both developing at the same rate such that they will be ready to commence and successfully continue implantation at the same time. Many different events, including controlled ovarian hyperstimulation as routinely used in IVF, can potentially disrupt embryo-endometrial synchrony. There is some evidence in humans that implantation rates are significantly reduced when embryo-endometrial development asynchrony is greater than 3 days (±1.5 days).

Conclusions: Embryo-endometrial synchrony is critical for successful implantation. There is an unmet need for improved precision in the evaluation of endometrial development to permit better synchronization of the embryo and the endometrium prior to implantation.

Citing Articles

Factors influencing endometrial receptivity in women with recurrent implantation failure.

Opuchlik K, Pankiewicz K, Pierzynski P, Sierdzinski J, Aleksejeva E, Salumets A BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):15.

PMID: 39789542 PMC: 11715555. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03531-z.

The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.

Sisljagic D, Blazetic S, Heffer M, Vranjes Delac M, Muller A Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767708 PMC: 11673887. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122801.

Embryo Cryopreservation Strategy May Improve Live Birth for Women Underwent In Vitro Maturation After Early Oocyte Retrieval: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Luo C, Zhang J, Wang X, Dai Y, Yan L, Du Y Reprod Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39630368 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01756-9.

Global research trends in endometrial receptivity from 2000 to 2024: bibliometric analysis.

Liu Z, Zhang Z, Xie P Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1465893.

PMID: 39540052 PMC: 11558532. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1465893.

Preovulatory progesterone levels are the top indicator for ovulation prediction based on machine learning model evaluation: a retrospective study.

Li Y, Zeng H, Fu J J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):169.

PMID: 39169388 PMC: 11337897. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01495-0.

References

Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H, Smitz J, VAN Steirteghem A, Devroey P . Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril. 1997; 67(3):521-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80080-5. View

Chai J, Lee K, Ng E, Yeung W, Ho P . Ovarian stimulation modulates steroid receptor expression and spheroid attachment in peri-implantation endometria: studies on natural and stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(3):764-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.015. View

Teklenburg G, Salker M, Molokhia M, Lavery S, Trew G, Aojanepong T . Natural selection of human embryos: decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PLoS One. 2010; 5(4):e10258. PMC: 2858159. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010258. View

Evans J, Hannan N, Edgell T, Vollenhoven B, Lutjen P, Osianlis T . Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(6):808-21. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu027. View

Koopman L, Kopcow H, Rybalov B, Boyson J, Orange J, Schatz F . Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. J Exp Med. 2003; 198(8):1201-12. PMC: 2194228. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20030305. View

Hanna J, Goldman-Wohl D, Hamani Y, Avraham I, Greenfield C, Natanson-Yaron S . Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat Med. 2006; 12(9):1065-74. DOI: 10.1038/nm1452. View

Labarta E, Martinez-Conejero J, Alama P, Horcajadas J, Pellicer A, Simon C . Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1813-25. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der126. View

Noyes R, Hertig A, Rock J . Reprint of: Dating the Endometrial Biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(4 Suppl1):e93-e115. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.079. View

Khalifa E, Brzyski R, Oehninger S, Acosta A, Muasher S . Sonographic appearance of the endometrium: the predictive value for the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod. 1992; 7(5):677-80. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137718. View

10.

Lundkvist O, Nilsson B . Endometrial ultrastructure in the early uterine response to blastocysts and artificial deciduogenic stimuli in rats. Cell Tissue Res. 1982; 225(2):355-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00214688. View

11.

Deligdisch L . Hormonal pathology of the endometrium. Mod Pathol. 2000; 13(3):285-94. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880050. View

12.

Fanchin R, Righini C, Ayoubi J, Olivennes F, De Ziegler D, Frydman R . New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 74(2):274-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00643-9. View

13.

Navot D, Laufer N, Kopolovic J, Rabinowitz R, Birkenfeld A, Lewin A . Artificially induced endometrial cycles and establishment of pregnancies in the absence of ovaries. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314(13):806-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198603273141302. View

14.

Blumenfeld Z . Why more is less and less is more when it comes to ovarian stimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(12):1713-9. PMC: 4681727. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0599-7. View

15.

Van Vaerenbergh I, Fatemi H, Blockeel C, Van Lommel L, Int Veld P, Schuit F . Progesterone rise on HCG day in GnRH antagonist/rFSH stimulated cycles affects endometrial gene expression. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 22(3):263-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.002. View

16.

Li T, Nuttall L, Klentzeris L, Cooke I . How well does ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness predict the results of histological dating?. Hum Reprod. 1992; 7(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137538. View

17.

Van Vaerenbergh I, Van Lommel L, Ghislain V, Int Veld P, Schuit F, Fatemi H . In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(5):1085-91. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den501. View

18.

Zhang S, Lin H, Kong S, Wang S, Wang H, Wang H . Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation. Mol Aspects Med. 2013; 34(5):939-80. PMC: 4278353. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011. View

19.

Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R . Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092. View

20.

Young S . Oestrogen and progesterone action on endometrium: a translational approach to understanding endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27(5):497-505. PMC: 3818404. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.010. View