Endometrial Fluid Biomarkers and Their Potential As Predictors of Successful Embryo Implantation

Overview

Journal Biomedicine (Taipei)

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Nov 8

PMID 37937060

Authors

Ana R Alves

Margarida F Dias

Margarida Silvestre

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers.

Methods: This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and 'embryo implantation' was used.

Results: Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Conclusions: Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.

Citing Articles

Decreased expression of and in endometriosis during the secretory phase of menstrual cycle: Insights from a case-control study on molecular biomarkers and disease-related infertility.

Hagh Y, Ahmadifard M, Esmaelzadeh S, Abbaszadeh S, Shokrzadeh N Int J Reprod Biomed. 2025; 22(12):1003-1014.

PMID: 39968362 PMC: 11830922. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v22i12.18066.

Irisin in Reproduction: Its Roles and Therapeutic Potential in Male and Female Fertility Disorders.

Khan M, Khan M, Wahab F Biomolecules. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39456155 PMC: 11505643. DOI: 10.3390/biom14101222.

References

Preaubert L, Shaulov T, Phillips S, Pradervand P, Kadoch I, Lapensee L . In freeze-all embryo cycles due to endometrial fluid (EF), live birth rates are comparable to those of controls, despite high rates of EF recurrence and cycle cancellation. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020; 50(6):101960. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101960. View

Hou Z, He A, Zhang Q, Liu N, Liu D, Li Y . Endometrial fluid aspiration immediately prior to embryo transfer does not affect IVF/vitrified-warmed embryo transfer outcomes - a prospective matched cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022; 44(3):486-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.004. View

Wyns C, De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka M, Motrenko T, Smeenk J . ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod Open. 2021; 2021(3):hoab026. PMC: 8342033. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab026. View

Heng S, Paule S, Li Y, Rombauts L, Vollenhoven B, Salamonsen L . Posttranslational removal of α-dystroglycan N terminus by PC5/6 cleavage is important for uterine preparation for embryo implantation in women. FASEB J. 2015; 29(9):4011-22. DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-269456. View

Wang L, Lv S, Mao W, Pei M, Yang X . Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020; 36(10):917-921. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1727433. View

Salamonsen L, Evans J, Nguyen H, Edgell T . The Microenvironment of Human Implantation: Determinant of Reproductive Success. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2015; 75(3):218-25. DOI: 10.1111/aji.12450. View

Tawfeek M, Eid M, Hasan A, Mostafa M, El-Serogy H . Assessment of leukemia inhibitory factor and glycoprotein 130 expression in endometrium and uterine flushing: a possible diagnostic tool for impaired fertility. BMC Womens Health. 2012; 12:10. PMC: 3448518. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-10. View

Edgell T, Rombauts L, Salamonsen L . Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27(5):486-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.05.014. View

Cheng X, Liu J, Shan H, Sun L, Huang C, Yan Q . Activating transcription factor 3 promotes embryo attachment via up-regulation of leukemia inhibitory factor in vitro. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017; 15(1):42. PMC: 5457579. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-017-0260-7. View

10.

Giacomini E, Makieva S, Murdica V, Vago R, Vigano P . Extracellular vesicles as a potential diagnostic tool in assisted reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 32(3):179-184. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000621. View

11.

Guo X, Yi H, Li T, Wang Y, Wang H, Chen X . Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Human Embryo Implantation: Clinical Implications. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(2). PMC: 7916576. DOI: 10.3390/biom11020253. View

12.

Cheong Y, Boomsma C, Heijnen C, Macklon N . Uterine secretomics: a window on the maternal-embryo interface. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(4):1093-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.144. View

13.

Edgell T, Evans J, Lazzaro L, Boyes K, Sridhar M, Catt S . Assessment of potential biomarkers of pre-receptive and receptive endometrium in uterine fluid and a functional evaluation of the potential role of CSF3 in fertility. Cytokine. 2018; 111:222-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.08.026. View

14.

Matorras R, Quevedo S, Corral B, Prieto B, Exposito A, Mendoza R . Proteomic pattern of implantative human endometrial fluid in in vitro fertilization cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 297(6):1577-1586. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4753-1. View

15.

Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang H, Duan E . Uterine Fluid in Pregnancy: A Biological and Clinical Outlook. Trends Mol Med. 2017; 23(7):604-614. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.05.002. View

16.

Cui J, Liu Y, Wang X . The Roles of Glycodelin in Cancer Development and Progression. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:1685. PMC: 5712544. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01685. View

17.

Zhang W, Cao L, Zhao Y, Li J, Li B, Lv J . Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with deleterious pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(1):9. PMC: 7859802. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3623. View

18.

Franasiak J, Holoch K, Yuan L, Schammel D, Young S, Lessey B . Prospective assessment of midsecretory endometrial leukemia inhibitor factor expression versus ανβ3 testing in women with unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(6):1724-31. PMC: 4101991. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.027. View

19.

Mishra A, Ashary N, Sharma R, Modi D . Extracellular vesicles in embryo implantation and disorders of the endometrium. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020; 85(2):e13360. DOI: 10.1111/aji.13360. View

20.

Heng S, Hannan N, Rombauts L, Salamonsen L, Nie G . PC6 levels in uterine lavage are closely associated with uterine receptivity and significantly lower in a subgroup of women with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(4):840-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der002. View