» Articles » PMID: 27461963

Penile Girth Enhancement With Polymethylmethacrylate-Based Soft Tissue Fillers

Overview
Journal J Sex Med
Date 2016 Jul 28
PMID 27461963
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: An unknown percentage of men will take every risk to develop a larger penis. Thus far, most injectables have caused serious problems. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) microspheres have been injected as a wrinkle filler and volumizer with increasing safety since 1989.

Aim: To report on a safe and permanently effective method to enhance penile girth and length with an approved dermal filler (ie, PMMA).

Methods: Since 2007, the senior author has performed penile augmentation in 752 men mainly with Metacrill, a suspension of PMMA microspheres in carboxymethyl-cellulose.

Main Outcome Measures: The data of 729 patients and 203 completed questionnaires were evaluated statistically.

Results: The overall satisfaction rate was 8.7 on a scale of 1 to 10. After one to three injection sessions, average girth increased by 3.5 cm, or 134% (10.2 to 13.7 cm = 134.31%). Penile length also increased by weight and stretching force of the implant from an average of 9.8 to 10.5 cm. Approximately half the patients perceived some irregularities of the implant, which caused no problems. Complications occurred in 0.4%, when PMMA nodules had to be surgically removed in three of the 24% of patients who had a non-circumcised penis.

Conclusion: After 5 years of development, penile augmentation with PMMA microspheres appears to be a natural, safe, and permanently effective method. The only complication of nodule formation and other irregularities can be overcome by an improved injection technique and better postimplantation care.

Citing Articles

A Case of Kanamycin Self-Injection for Penile Augmentation and a Literature Review of Penile Foreign Body Injections.

Salik M, Yar S, G N, Ibrahim A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73325.

PMID: 39659313 PMC: 11628213. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73325.


Dynamic compliance penis enlargement patch.

Zheng R, Zhong W, Chai M, Shi X Bioact Mater. 2024; 42:194-206.

PMID: 39285912 PMC: 11403245. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.039.


Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life.

Falagario U, Piramide F, Pang K, Durukan E, Tzelves L, Ricapito A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(5.

PMID: 38792941 PMC: 11123079. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050758.


Cosmetic male genital surgery: a narrative review.

Danino M, Trouilloud P, Benkhadra M, Danino A, Laurent R Ann Transl Med. 2024; 12(1):11.

PMID: 38304911 PMC: 10777246. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-351.


Complications and outcomes following injection of foreign material into the male external genitalia for augmentation: a single-centre experience and systematic review.

Pang K, Randhawa K, Tang S, Fallara G, Katelaris A, Castiglione F Int J Impot Res. 2023; 36(5):498-508.

PMID: 36859681 PMC: 11251987. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00675-8.