» Articles » PMID: 38792941

Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38792941
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The increase in practices related to enhancing penile size can be attributed to the belief that an improved genital appearance contributes to a man's virility, coupled with an altered self-perception of his body. It is crucial to tailor interventions to meet the genuine needs of patients by thoroughly assessing their history, psychological state, and potential surgical benefits, all while considering the associated risks of complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on outcomes, complications, and quality of life after penile augmentation surgery, examining both minimally invasive and more radical techniques. A search of the PubMed and Scopus databases, focusing on English-language papers published in the last 15 years, was performed in December 2023. Papers discussing surgery in animal models and case reports were excluded from the present study unless further evaluated in a follow-up case series. The primary outcomes were changes in penile dimensions, specifically in terms of length and girth, as well as the incidence of surgical complications and the impact on quality of life. A total of 1670 articles were retrieved from the search and 46 were included for analysis. Procedures for penile length perceived enhancements include lipoplasty, skin reconstruction plasty, V-Y and Z plasty, flap reconstruction, scrotoplasty, ventral phalloplasty, and suspensory ligament release; techniques for increasing corporal penile length include penile disassembly, total phalloplasty, and sliding elongation. Finally, penile girth enhancement may be performed using soft tissue fillers, grafting procedures, biodegradable scaffolds, and Penuma. In conclusion, while penile augmentation surgeries offer potential solutions for individuals concerned about genital size, the risks and complexities need to be accounted for.

References
1.
Xu T, Zhang G, Bai W, Li Q, Yang A, Lin Q . Complications and Management of Penile Girth Enhancement with Acellular Dermal Matrix. J Sex Med. 2019; 16(12):2011-2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.010. View

2.
Vyas K, Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Morrison S, Manrique O . Aesthetic Augmentation Phalloplasty: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146(5):995-1006. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007249. View

3.
Westerman M, Tausch T, Zhao L, Siegel J, Starke N, Klein A . Ventral Slit Scrotal Flap: A New Outpatient Surgical Option for Reconstruction of Adult Buried Penis Syndrome. Urology. 2015; 85(6):1501-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.030. View

4.
Miranda-Sousa A, Keating M, Moreira S, Baker M, Carrion R . Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2007; 4(5):1494-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00551.x. View

5.
Perovic S, Djinovic R, Bumbasirevic M, Djordjevic M, Vukovic P . Total phalloplasty using a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. BJU Int. 2007; 100(4):899-905. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07084.x. View