» Articles » PMID: 27453733

Challenges Associated with Insulin Therapy Progression Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Latin American MOSAIc Study Baseline Data

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Jul 26
PMID 27453733
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes is commonly recorded worldwide; Latin America (LA) is not an exception. Barriers to intensifying insulin therapy and which barriers are most likely to negatively impact outcomes are not completely known. The objective was to identify barriers to insulin progression in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in LA countries (Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina).

Methods: MOSAIc is a multinational, non-interventional, prospective, observational study aiming to identify the patient-, physician-, and healthcare-based factors affecting insulin intensification. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, had T2DM, and were treated with insulin for ≥3 months with/without oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial data were collected at baseline and regular intervals during the 24-month follow-up period. This paper however, focuses on baseline data analysis. The association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and selected covariates was assessed.

Results: A trend toward a higher level of HbA1c was observed in the LA versus non-LA population (8.40 ± 2.79 versus 8.18 ± 2.28; p ≤ 0.069). Significant differences were observed in clinical parameters, treatment patterns, and patient-reported outcomes in LA compared with the rest of the cohorts and between Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina. Higher number of insulin injections and lower number of OADs were used, whereas a lower level of knowledge and a higher level of diabetes-related distress were reported in LA. Covariates associated with HbA1c levels included age (-0.0129; p < 0.0001), number of OADs (0.0835; p = 0.0264), higher education level (-0.2261; p = 0.0101), healthy diet (-0.0555; p = 0.0083), self-monitoring blood glucose (-0.0512; p = 0.0033), hurried communication style in the process of care (0.1295; p = 0.0208), number of insulin injections (0.1616; p = 0.0088), adherence (-0.1939; p ≤ 0.0104), and not filling insulin prescription due to associated cost (0.2651; p = 0.0198).

Conclusion: MOSAIc baseline data showed that insulin intensification in LA is not optimal and identified several conditions that significantly affect attaining appropriate HbA1c values. Tailored public health strategies, including education, should be developed to overcome such barriers. Trial Registration NCT01400971.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of a diabetes program based on digital health on capacity building and quality of care in type 2 diabetes: a pragmatic quasi-experimental study.

Morelli D, Rubinstein F, Santero M, Gibbons L, Moyano D, Nejamis A BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):101.

PMID: 36721213 PMC: 9887565. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09082-7.


Patient-reported outcomes for diabetes and hypertension care in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Masyuko S, Ngongo C, Smith C, Nugent R PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0245269.

PMID: 33449968 PMC: 7810280. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245269.


Factors associated with glycemic control among South African adult residents of Mkhondo municipality living with diabetes mellitus.

Masilela C, Pearce B, Ongole J, Adeniyi O, Benjeddou M Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(48):e23467.

PMID: 33235135 PMC: 7710224. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023467.


Injectable Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Adherence, Persistence, and Health Outcomes.

Hamersky C, Fridman M, Gamble C, Iyer N Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(3):865-890.

PMID: 31054132 PMC: 6531561. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-0617-3.


Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.

Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara Y, Baruah M, Chadha M, Chandalia H Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 21(4):600-617.

PMID: 28670547 PMC: 5477451. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_97_17.

References
1.
Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, Lewin A, Gabbay R, Hu P . Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 Diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(2):260-5. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.260. View

2.
Gagliardino J, Kleinebreil L, Colagiuri S, Flack J, Caporale J, Siri F . Comparison of clinical-metabolic monitoring and outcomes and coronary risk status in people with type 2 diabetes from Australia, France and Latin America. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 88(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.024. View

3.
Philis-Tsimikas A . Initiating basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: practical steps to optimize glycemic control. Am J Med. 2013; 126(9 Suppl 1):S21-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.06.010. View

4.
Holman R, Farmer A, Davies M, Levy J, Darbyshire J, Keenan J . Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(18):1736-47. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905479. View

5.
Brown J, Nichols G . Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003; 9(3):213-7. View