» Articles » PMID: 27436666

Sugar-sweetened Beverages Coverage in the British Media: an Analysis of Public Health Advocacy Versus Pro-industry Messaging

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jul 21
PMID 27436666
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).

Design: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles.

Results: We identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving.

Conclusions: SSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control.

Citing Articles

A Content Analysis of Online Messages about Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.

Li Y, Shen L, Dillard J, Li S Nutrients. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38613038 PMC: 11013644. DOI: 10.3390/nu16071005.


Health taxes in Indonesia: a review of policy debates on the tobacco, alcoholic beverages and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the media.

Ahsan A, Amalia N, Rahmayanti K, Adani N, Wiyono N, Endawansa A BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(Suppl 8).

PMID: 37813444 PMC: 10565181. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012042.


What works in advocating for food advertising policy change across an english region - a realist evaluation.

Sykes S, Watkins M, Bond M, Jenkins C, Wills J BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1896.

PMID: 37784142 PMC: 10544363. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16829-8.


Framing a New Nutrition Policy: Changes on Key Stakeholder's Discourses throughout the Implementation of the Chilean Food Labelling Law.

Mediano F, Fierro C, Corvalan C, Reyes M, Correa T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(9).

PMID: 37174218 PMC: 10178804. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095700.


Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.

Penney T, Jones C, Pell D, Cummins S, Adams J, Forde H BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):280.

PMID: 36750834 PMC: 9906897. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15190-0.


References
1.
Brownell K, Warner K . The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?. Milbank Q. 2009; 87(1):259-94. PMC: 2879177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x. View

2.
de Koning L, Malik V, Kellogg M, Rimm E, Willett W, Hu F . Sweetened beverage consumption, incident coronary heart disease, and biomarkers of risk in men. Circulation. 2012; 125(14):1735-41, S1. PMC: 3368965. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067017. View

3.
Briggs A, Mytton O, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Rayner M, Scarborough P . Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ. 2013; 347:f6189. PMC: 3814405. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6189. View

4.
Collins B, Capewell S, Oflaherty M, Timpson H, Razzaq A, Cheater S . Modelling the Health Impact of an English Sugary Drinks Duty at National and Local Levels. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0130770. PMC: 4486083. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130770. View

5.
Tucker L, Tucker J, Bailey B, Lecheminant J . A 4-year prospective study of soft drink consumption and weight gain: the role of calorie intake and physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2014; 29(4):262-5. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.130619-ARB-315. View