» Articles » PMID: 27406589

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Standard Dose Bevacizumab Versus Low Dose Bevacizumab Plus Lomustine (CCNU) in Adults with Recurrent Glioblastoma

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Jul 14
PMID 27406589
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N = 71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m(2)). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96-8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69-5.55, p = 0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17-13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5-6.01, p = 0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.

Citing Articles

Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter? Our monocentric and comparative experience.

Cerretti G, Bosio A, Librizzi G, Pintacuda G, Caccese M, Salvalaggio A J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40063186 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04992-4.


Targeted agents in patients with progressive glioblastoma-A systematic meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Ippen F, Scherm A, Kessler T, Hau P, Agkatsev S, Baurecht H Cancer Med. 2024; 13(12):e7362.

PMID: 39618405 PMC: 11192969. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7362.


Importance of Autophagy Regulation in Glioblastoma with Temozolomide Resistance.

Hwang Y, Lee D, Lee E, Oh J Cells. 2024; 13(16.

PMID: 39195222 PMC: 11353125. DOI: 10.3390/cells13161332.


A prognostic model for overall survival in recurrent glioma patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy.

Jin S, Chen W, Guo X, Xing H, Yang H, Liu Q Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):85.

PMID: 38517553 PMC: 10959905. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-00944-y.


Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map.

Fu M, Zhou Z, Huang X, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhang J BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):544.

PMID: 37316802 PMC: 10265794. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11043-6.


References
1.
Gilbert M, Dignam J, Armstrong T, Wefel J, Blumenthal D, Vogelbaum M . A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(8):699-708. PMC: 4201043. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573. View

2.
Rubinstein L, Korn E, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy S, Smith M . Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(28):7199-206. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.149. View

3.
Wick W, Puduvalli V, Chamberlain M, van den Bent M, Carpentier A, Cher L . Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7):1168-74. PMC: 2834468. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2595. View

4.
Jain R . Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001; 7(9):987-9. DOI: 10.1038/nm0901-987. View

5.
de Groot J . High-dose antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: less may be more?. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(19):6109-11. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1853. View