» Articles » PMID: 21986722

Phase II Study of Carboplatin, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab for Bevacizumab Naïve, Recurrent Glioblastoma

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab among bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients in a phase 2, open-label, single arm trial. Forty eligible patients received carboplatin (area under the plasma curve [AUC] 4 mg/ml-min) on day one, while bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and irinotecan (340 mg/m(2) for patients on CYP3A-enzyme-inducing anti-epileptics [EIAEDs] and 125 mg/m(2) for patients not on EIAEDs) were administered on days 1 and 14 of every 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated after each of the first two cycles and then after every other cycle. Treatment continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, non-compliance, or voluntary withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and secondary endpoints included safety and median overall survival (OS). All patients had progression after standard therapy. The median age was 51 years. Sixteen patients (40%) had a KPS of 90-100, while 27 (68%) were at first progression. The median time from original diagnosis was 11.4 months. The PFS-6 rate was 46.5% (95% CI: 30.4, 61.0%) and the median OS was 8.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9, and 10.7 months]. Grade 4 events were primarily hematologic and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 20 and 10%, respectively. The most common grade 3 events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and infection in 25, 20, 13, and 10%, respectively. Eleven patients (28%) discontinued study therapy due to toxicity and 17 patients (43%) required dose modification. One patient died due to treatment-related intestinal perforation. The addition of carboplatin and irinotecan to bevacizumab significantly increases toxicity but does not improve anti-tumor activity to that achieved historically with single-agent bevacizumab among bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent GBM patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00953121).

Citing Articles

A Review of Therapeutic Agents Given by Convection-Enhanced Delivery for Adult Glioblastoma.

Rolfe N, Dadario N, Canoll P, Bruce J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(8).

PMID: 39204078 PMC: 11357193. DOI: 10.3390/ph17080973.


Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Lu Y, Liao L, Du K, Mo J, Zou X, Liang J BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):133.

PMID: 38273249 PMC: 10811825. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11848-z.


Unlocking Bevacizumab's Potential: rCBV as a Predictive Biomarker for Enhanced Survival in Glioblastoma IDH-Wildtype Patients.

Alvarez-Torres M, Balana C, Fuster-Garcia E, Puig J, Garcia-Gomez J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201588 PMC: 10778147. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010161.


[Re-irradiation and Bevacizumab - active combination for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma].

Seidel C, Nicolay N Strahlenther Onkol. 2023; 199(6):604-606.

PMID: 37079088 PMC: 10212840. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02084-8.


NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Tsien C, Pugh S, Dicker A, Raizer J, Matuszak M, Lallana E J Clin Oncol. 2022; 41(6):1285-1295.

PMID: 36260832 PMC: 9940937. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00164.


References
1.
Vredenburgh J, Desjardins A, Herndon 2nd J, Dowell J, Reardon D, Quinn J . Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13(4):1253-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2309. View

2.
Winkler F, Kozin S, Tong R, Chae S, Booth M, Garkavtsev I . Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. 2004; 6(6):553-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.011. View

3.
Keunen O, Johansson M, Oudin A, Sanzey M, Abdul Rahim S, Fack F . Anti-VEGF treatment reduces blood supply and increases tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(9):3749-54. PMC: 3048093. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014480108. View

4.
Lamborn K, Chang S, Prados M . Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2004; 6(3):227-35. PMC: 1871999. DOI: 10.1215/S1152851703000620. View

5.
Rubenstein J, Kim J, Ozawa T, Zhang M, Westphal M, Deen D . Anti-VEGF antibody treatment of glioblastoma prolongs survival but results in increased vascular cooption. Neoplasia. 2000; 2(4):306-14. PMC: 1550290. DOI: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900102. View