» Articles » PMID: 27405322

Effect of Nivolumab on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Treatment-naïve Advanced Melanoma: Results from the Phase III CheckMate 066 Study

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jul 14
PMID 27405322
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nivolumab has shown significant survival benefit and a favorable safety profile compared with dacarbazine chemotherapy among treatment-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma in the CheckMate 066 phase III study. Results from the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) analyses from CheckMate 066 are presented.

Patients And Methods: HRQoL was evaluated at baseline and every 6 weeks while on treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Care (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D). Via a multi-step statistical plan, data were analyzed descriptively, cross-sectionally, and longitudinally, adjusting for baseline covariates, in patients having baseline plus ≥1 post-baseline assessment.

Results: Baseline-adjusted completion rates for all HRQoL questionnaires across treatment arms were 65% and 70% for dacarbazine and nivolumab, respectively, and remained similar throughout treatment. The mean baseline HRQoL scores were similar for patients treated with nivolumab and dacarbazine. Baseline HRQoL levels with nivolumab were maintained over time. This exploratory analysis showed a between-arm difference in favor of nivolumab on the EQ-5D utility index and clinically meaningful EQ-5D improvements from baseline at several time points for patients receiving nivolumab. Patients treated with nivolumab did not show increased symptom burden as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30. No HRQoL change was noted with dacarbazine patients up to week 43, although the high attrition rate after week 13 did not allow any meaningful analyses. Patients receiving nivolumab deteriorated significantly later than those receiving dacarbazine on several EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and the EQ-5D utility index.

Conclusions: In addition to prolonged survival, these exploratory HRQoL results show that nivolumab maintains baseline HRQoL levels to provide long-term quality of survival benefit, compared with dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma.

Citing Articles

Multidisciplinary Canadian consensus on the multimodal management of high-risk and radioactive iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma.

Ezzat S, Pasternak J, Rajaraman M, Abdel-Rahman O, Boucher A, Chau N Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1437360.

PMID: 39558957 PMC: 11570806. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1437360.


Real-life effectiveness on overall survival of continued immune checkpoint inhibition following progression in advanced melanoma: estimation from the Melbase cohort.

Macaire C, Lefevre W, Dalac S, Montaudie H, Legoupil D, Dereure O Melanoma Res. 2024; 35(1):50-59.

PMID: 39527777 PMC: 11670915. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000973.


Quality of life under treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab in melanoma patients. Real-world data from a prospective observational study at the Skin Cancer Center Kiel.

Grote C, Bohne A, Blome C, Kahler K J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(10):454.

PMID: 39387946 PMC: 11467021. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05981-2.


Combined Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Treatment in Stage IV Melanoma Patients: A Bicentric Analysis of Real-World Data and a Modern Treatment Scenario Proving Lactate Dehydrogenase's Usefulness.

Silasi A, Sievert A, Danciu P, Lefter A, Afrasanie V, Sur D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535074 PMC: 10969038. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060654.


Immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma therapy (Review).

Shah V, Panchal V, Shah A, Vyas B, Agrawal S, Bharadwaj S Med Int (Lond). 2024; 4(2):13.

PMID: 38410760 PMC: 10895472. DOI: 10.3892/mi.2024.137.


References
1.
Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B, Sprangers M, Te Velde A . Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. The Study Group on Quality of Life of the EORTC and the Symptom Control and Quality of Life Committees of the.... Qual Life Res. 1997; 6(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026429831234. View

2.
Grob J, Amonkar M, Martin-Algarra S, Demidov L, Goodman V, Grotzinger K . Patient perception of the benefit of a BRAF inhibitor in metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the BREAK-3 study comparing dabrafenib with dacarbazine. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(7):1428-1436. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu154. View

3.
Schadendorf D, Amonkar M, Milhem M, Grotzinger K, Demidov L, Rutkowski P . Functional and symptom impact of trametinib versus chemotherapy in BRAF V600E advanced or metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the METRIC study. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(3):700-706. PMC: 4433512. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt580. View

4.
Schadendorf D, Amonkar M, Stroyakovskiy D, Levchenko E, Gogas H, De Braud F . Health-related quality of life impact in a randomised phase III study of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(7):833-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.004. View

5.
Robert C, Long G, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L . Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2014; 372(4):320-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. View