» Articles » PMID: 27398600

Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Jul 12
PMID 27398600
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sound waveforms convey information largely via amplitude modulations (AM). A large body of experimental evidence has provided support for a modulation (bandpass) filterbank. Details of this model have varied over time partly reflecting different experimental conditions and diverse datasets from distinct task strategies, contributing uncertainty to the bandwidth measurements and leaving important issues unresolved. We adopt here a solely data-driven measurement approach in which we first demonstrate how different models can be subsumed within a common 'cascade' framework, and then proceed to characterize the cascade via system identification analysis using a single stimulus/task specification and hence stable task rules largely unconstrained by any model or parameters. Observers were required to detect a brief change in level superimposed onto random level changes that served as AM noise; the relationship between trial-by-trial noisy fluctuations and corresponding human responses enables targeted identification of distinct cascade elements. The resulting measurements exhibit a dynamic complex picture in which human perception of auditory modulations appears adaptive in nature, evolving from an initial lowpass to bandpass modes (with broad tuning, Q∼1) following repeated stimulus exposure.

Citing Articles

A comparative study of eight human auditory models of monaural processing.

Osses Vecchi A, Varnet L, Carney L, Dau T, Bruce I, Verhulst S Acta Acust (2020). 2022; 6.

PMID: 36325461 PMC: 9625898. DOI: 10.1051/aacus/2022008.


Mechanisms of Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection for Normal- and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Ponsot E, Varnet L, Wallaert N, Daoud E, Shamma S, Lorenzi C Trends Hear. 2021; 25:2331216520978029.

PMID: 33620023 PMC: 7905488. DOI: 10.1177/2331216520978029.


Cascaded Tuning to Amplitude Modulation for Natural Sound Recognition.

Koumura T, Terashima H, Furukawa S J Neurosci. 2019; 39(28):5517-5533.

PMID: 31092586 PMC: 6616280. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2914-18.2019.


The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Neri P PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(12):e1006585.

PMID: 30513091 PMC: 6294397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006585.


Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Gockel H, Alsindi S, Hardy C, Carlyon R J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017; 18(6):803-813.

PMID: 28755308 PMC: 5688044. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0636-6.

References
1.
Piechowiak T, Ewert S, Dau T . Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(4):2111-26. DOI: 10.1121/1.2534227. View

2.
Bacon S, Grantham D . Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989; 85(6):2575-80. DOI: 10.1121/1.397751. View

3.
Strickland E, Viemeister N . Cues for discrimination of envelopes. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 99(6):3638-46. DOI: 10.1121/1.414962. View

4.
Sheft S, Yost W . Discrimination of starting phase with sinusoidal envelope modulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(2):EL84-9. PMC: 2718554. DOI: 10.1121/1.2430766. View

5.
Neri P . Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, non-linearity. Front Comput Neurosci. 2011; 4:151. PMC: 3014650. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00151. View