Elective Single Embryo Transfer in Women Less Than Age 38 years Reduces Multiple Birth Rates, but Not Live Birth Rates, in United States Fertility Clinics

Overview

Journal Fertil Steril

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2016 Jul 5

PMID 27376458

Citations 13

Authors

Abigail C Mancuso

Sheree L Boulet

Eyup Duran

Erika Munch

Dmitry M Kissin

Bradley J Van Voorhis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of elective single ET (eSET) on live birth and multiple birth rates by a cycle-level and clinic-level analysis.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): Patient ages <35 and 35-37 years old.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinics were divided into groups based on eSET rate for each age group and aggregate rates of live birth per ET and multiple birth per delivery were calculated. A cycle-level analysis comparing eSET and double ET (DET) live birth and multiple birth rates was also performed, stratified based on total number (2, 3, or 4+) of embryos available, embryo stage, and patient age.

Result(s): There was a linear decrease in multiple birth rate with increasing eSET rate and no significant difference in clinic-level live birth rates for each age group. Cycle-level analysis found slightly higher live birth rates with double ET, but this was mainly observed in women aged 35-37 years or with four or more embryos available for transfer, and confirmed the marked reduction in multiple births with eSET.

Conclusion(s): Our study showed a marked and linear reduction in multiple birth rates, and important, little to no effect on clinic-level live birth rates with increasing rates of eSET supporting the growing evidence that eSET is effective in decreasing the high multiple birth rates associated with IVF and suggests that eSET should be used more frequently than is currently practiced.

Citing Articles

The association between female age and pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving first elective single embryo transfer cycle: a retrospective cohort study.

Wang X, Tian P, Zhao Y, Lu J, Dong C, Zhang C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19216.

PMID: 39160203 PMC: 11333704. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70249-1.

ESHRE guideline: number of embryos to transfer during IVF/ICSI†.

Alteri A, Arroyo G, Baccino G, Craciunas L, De Geyter C, Ebner T Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(4):647-657.

PMID: 38364208 PMC: 10988112. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae010.

Predictors of twin pregnancy in in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with day 3 double embryo transfer.

Nguyen D, Hoang H, Ho V, Pham T, Nguyen N, Tran V Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2023; 51(1):69-74.

PMID: 38148476 PMC: 10914505. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2023.06156.

Blastocyst Transplantation Strategies in Women of Different Ages.

Yang D, Chai M, Yang N, Yang H, Wen X, Wang J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36836152 PMC: 9958534. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041618.

Pathways to fatherhood: evaluating the priorities of self-identified gay and bisexual men pursuing family building options.

Hanson B, Leondires M, Glatthorn H, Kaser D, Hotaling J, Cheng P F S Rep. 2022; 3(2 Suppl):91-99.

PMID: 35937454 PMC: 9349239. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.09.003.

References

Ryan G, Sparks A, Sipe C, Syrop C, Dokras A, Van Voorhis B . A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(2):354-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001. View

Chambers G, Illingworth P, Sullivan E . Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia. Med J Aust. 2011; 195(10):594-8. DOI: 10.5694/mja10.11448. View

Kresowik J, Stegmann B, Sparks A, Ryan G, Van Voorhis B . Five-years of a mandatory single-embryo transfer (mSET) policy dramatically reduces twinning rate without lowering pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(6):1367-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.007. View

Criniti A, Thyer A, Chow G, Lin P, Klein N, Soules M . Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84(6):1613-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.035. View

Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington K . The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011; 159(3):409-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.017. View

Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft W, Wells D . Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(11):2596-608. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den287. View

Forman E, Hong K, Franasiak J, Scott Jr R . Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 210(2):157.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.016. View

Gleicher N, Barad D . The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(6):1337-44. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del026. View

Hojgaard A, Ottosen L, Kesmodel U, Ingerslev H . Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer - a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(10):2673-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem173. View

10.

Kulkarni A, Jamieson D, Jones Jr H, Kissin D, Gallo M, Macaluso M . Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(23):2218-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301467. View

11.

Lemos E, Zhang D, Van Voorhis B, Hu X . Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209(6):586.e1-586.e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.005. View

12.

Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munne S . The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(4):876-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.014. View

13.

Papanikolaou E, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Venetis C, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B . Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2007; 23(1):91-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem339. View

14.

Styer A, Wright D, Wolkovich A, Veiga C, Toth T . Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(6):1702-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.036. View

15.

Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Nyboe Andersen A . Morbidity in a Danish national cohort of 472 IVF/ICSI twins, 1132 non-IVF/ICSI twins and 634 IVF/ICSI singletons: health-related and social implications for the children and their families. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(6):1234-43. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg257. View

16.

Grifo J, Hodes-Wertz B, Lee H, Amperloquio E, Clarke-Williams M, Adler A . Single thawed euploid embryo transfer improves IVF pregnancy, miscarriage, and multiple gestation outcomes and has similar implantation rates as egg donation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013; 30(2):259-64. PMC: 3585677. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9929-1. View

17.

Thomas M, Sparks A, Ryan G, Van Voorhis B . Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo culture and transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009; 94(2):543-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.051. View

18.

McLernon D, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies M, De Neubourg D, Dumoulin J . Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 341:c6945. PMC: 3006495. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6945. View

19.

Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S . Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 17(1):107-20. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq028. View

20.

Forman E, Tao X, Ferry K, Taylor D, Treff N, Scott Jr R . Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(4):1217-22. PMC: 3303493. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des020. View