Evolution of Body Morphology and Beak Shape Revealed by a Morphometric Analysis of 14 Paridae Species

Overview

Journal Front Zool

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2016 Jul 2

PMID 27366199

Citations 10

Authors

ShiMiao Shao

Qing Quan

Tianlong Cai

Gang Song

Yanhua Qu

Fumin Lei

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Morphological characters of birds reflect their adaptive evolution and ecological requirements and are also relevant to phylogenetic relationships within a group of related species. The tits (Paridae) are known to be outwardly homogeneous in shape, with one aberrant member, the Ground Tit (Pseudopodoces humilis), which is quite different from its relatives in both body morphology and beak shape. We combined traditional measurements and geometric morphometrics to quantify the variation in body morphology and beak shape of 14 Paridae species distributed in China. Based on these results, we sought to assess the contribution of phylogeny, altitude and species interactions to the evolution of morphological traits.

Results: The basic features for discriminating among the 14 species studied here were overall body size, the ratio of body and tail length to culmen and tarsus length, and beak shape (long/slender/pointy vs. short/robust/blunt). These dimensions clearly separate Ps. humilis and Melanochlora sultanea from the other species in shape space. Body length and PC3 of beak shape (round outline vs. straight outline) show significant phylogenetic signals. Across 14 species, altitude is related to tarsus, culmen length and PC1 of beak shape. Within Parus major, altitude is related to body weight, body length, culmen length and PC1 of body morphology. Morphological distances and geographic distances among species are positively correlated.

Conclusions: The body morphology of Paridae species shows extensive evolutionary changes, while their beak has mainly evolved along the long/slender/pointy vs. short/robust/blunt dimension. Only body length and beak curvature show a phylogenetic signal. Altitude correlates with multiple traits both across and within species, suggesting that altitude is an important factor in promoting morphological divergence. The deviant appearance of Ps. humilis corresponds to its foraging and feeding adaptations to high-altitude steppe habitats. Our results also show a higher level of morphological divergence with greater difference in distribution ranges among the Paridae species involved in this study.

Citing Articles

Trait Variation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Avian Secondary Contact Zones.

Wang S, Wu L, Zhu Q, Wu J, Tang S, Zhao Y Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39194581 PMC: 11351749. DOI: 10.3390/biology13080643.

An analysis of the maxillary beak shape variation between 2 pure layer lines and its relationship to the underlying premaxillary bone, feather cover, and mortality.

Struthers S, Andersson B, Schmutz M, Matika O, McCormack H, Wilson P Poult Sci. 2023; 102(8):102854.

PMID: 37354620 PMC: 10404746. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102854.

Diversification of the shell shape and size in Baikal Candonidae ostracods inferred from molecular phylogeny.

Karanovic I, Pham H, Sitnikova T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2950.

PMID: 36806355 PMC: 9941104. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30003-5.

Complex genetic architecture of three-dimensional craniofacial shape variation in domestic pigeons.

Boer E, Maclary E, Shapiro M Evol Dev. 2021; 23(6):477-495.

PMID: 34914861 PMC: 9119316. DOI: 10.1111/ede.12395.

Parallel genomic responses to historical climate change and high elevation in East Asian songbirds.

Cheng Y, Miller M, Zhang D, Xiong Y, Hao Y, Jia C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(50).

PMID: 34873033 PMC: 8685689. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023918118.

References

Pagel M . Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999; 401(6756):877-84. DOI: 10.1038/44766. View

Forstmeier W, Leisler B, Kempenaers B . Bill morphology reflects female independence from male parental help. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1476):1583-8. PMC: 1088781. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1692. View

Rohlf F . Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution. 2002; 55(11):2143-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00731.x. View

Burns K, Hackett S, Klein N . Phylogenetic relationships and morphological diversity in Darwin's finches and their relatives. Evolution. 2002; 56(6):1240-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01435.x. View

Klingenberg C, Barluenga M, Meyer A . Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution. 2002; 56(10):1909-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x. View

Blomberg S, Garland Jr T, Ives A . Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution. 2003; 57(4):717-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x. View

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J . MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(12):1572-4. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. View

Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K . APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(2):289-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412. View

Richman A, Price T . Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers. Nature. 1992; 355(6363):817-21. DOI: 10.1038/355817a0. View

10.

Grenier J, Greenberg R . A biogeographic pattern in sparrow bill morphology: parallel adaptation to tidal marshes. Evolution. 2005; 59(7):1588-95. DOI: 10.1554/04-502. View

11.

Yang S, Yin Z, Ma X, Lei F . Phylogeography of ground tit (Pseudopodoces humilis) based on mtDNA: evidence of past fragmentation on the Tibetan Plateau. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006; 41(2):257-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.003. View

12.

Harmon L, Weir J, Brock C, Glor R, Challenger W . GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics. 2007; 24(1):129-31. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538. View

13.

Foster D, Podos J, Hendry A . A geometric morphometric appraisal of beak shape in Darwin's finches. J Evol Biol. 2007; 21(1):263-275. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01449.x. View

14.

Badyaev A, Young R, Oh K, Addison C . Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution. 2008; 62(8):1951-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00428.x. View

15.

Freckleton R, Harvey P, Pagel M . Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat. 2008; 160(6):712-26. DOI: 10.1086/343873. View

16.

Kulemeyer C, Asbahr K, Gunz P, Frahnert S, Bairlein F . Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls - a 3D geometric morphometric approach. Front Zool. 2009; 6:2. PMC: 2651141. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-2. View

17.

Dhondt A . Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: intensity and importance in relation to habitat quality. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 79(1):257-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01624.x. View

18.

Degrange F, Picasso M . Geometric morphometrics of the skull of Tinamidae (Aves, Palaeognathae). Zoology (Jena). 2010; 113(6):334-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2010.07.003. View

19.

Rohlf F, Marcus L . A revolution morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 8(4):129-32. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J. View

20.

Klingenberg C . MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 11(2):353-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x. View