» Articles » PMID: 27305855

An Excellent Navigation System and Experience in Craniomaxillofacial Navigation Surgery: a Double-center Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Jun 17
PMID 27305855
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed, and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients' time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries.

Citing Articles

Computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review.

Alkhayatt N, Alzahrani H, Ahmed S, Alotaibi B, Alsaggaf R, ALAlmuaysh A Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(3):387-394.

PMID: 38525182 PMC: 10960148. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.002.


Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.

Wu Y, Tao B, Lan K, Shen Y, Huang W, Wang F Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33(4):362-376.

PMID: 35113463 PMC: 9305866. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13897.


Application of a real-time 3-dimensional navigation system for treatment of synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint: A case report.

Matsuda S, Yoshimura H, Sano K Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(18):e15382.

PMID: 31045787 PMC: 6504332. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015382.


Application of computer-assisted surgery techniques in the management of zygomatic complex fractures.

Zhang X, Han C, Dai M, Chen J, Zheng X, Long J Chin J Traumatol. 2018; 21(5):281-286.

PMID: 30342986 PMC: 6235788. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.01.007.


PCANet-Based Structural Representation for Nonrigid Multimodal Medical Image Registration.

Zhu X, Ding M, Huang T, Jin X, Zhang X Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(5).

PMID: 29738512 PMC: 5982469. DOI: 10.3390/s18051477.


References
1.
Zhang S, Gui H, Lin Y, Shen G, Xu B . Navigation-guided correction of midfacial post-traumatic deformities (Shanghai experience with 40 cases). J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 70(6):1426-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.068. View

2.
Yu H, Shen G, Wang X, Zhang S . Navigation-guided reduction and orbital floor reconstruction in the treatment of zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 68(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.058. View

3.
Sun Y, Luebbers H, Agbaje J, Lambrichts I, Politis C . The accuracy of image-guided navigation for maxillary positioning in bimaxillary surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(3):1095-9. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000633. View

4.
Heiland M, Habermann C, Schmelzle R . Indications and limitations of intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(9):1059-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.013. View

5.
Kaduk W, Podmelle F, Louis P . Surgical navigation in reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013; 25(2):313-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.01.003. View