Three-dimensional Surgical Simulation Improves the Planning for Correction of Facial Prognathism and Asymmetry: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2017 Jan 11

PMID 28071714

Citations 28

Authors

Cheng-Ting Ho

Hsiu-Hsia Lin

Eric J W Liou

Lun-Jou Lo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Traditional planning method for orthognathic surgery has limitations of cephalometric analysis, especially for patients with asymmetry. The aim of this study was to assess surgical plan modification after 3-demensional (3D) simulation. The procedures were to perform traditional surgical planning, construction of 3D model for the initial surgical plan (P1), 3D model of altered surgical plan after simulation (P2), comparison between P1 and P2 models, surgical execution, and postoperative validation using superimposition and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between postoperative 3D image and P2 simulation model. Surgical plan was modified after 3D simulation in 93% of the cases. Absolute linear changes of landmarks in mediolateral direction (x-axis) were significant and between 1.11 to 1.62 mm. The pitch, yaw, and roll rotation as well as ramus inclination correction also showed significant changes after the 3D planning. Yaw rotation of the maxillomandibular complex (1.88 ± 0.32°) and change of ramus inclination (3.37 ± 3.21°) were most frequently performed for correction of the facial asymmetry. Errors between the postsurgical image and 3D simulation were acceptable, with RMSD 0.63 ± 0.25 mm for the maxilla and 0.85 ± 0.41 mm for the mandible. The information from this study could be used to augment the clinical planning and surgical execution when a conventional approach is applied.

Citing Articles

[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].

Xu X, Wu L, Song F, Li Z, Zhang Y, Liu X Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 56(1):57-65.

PMID: 38318897 PMC: 10845196.

Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Treatment Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Alhabshi M, Aldhohayan H, BaEissa O, Al Shehri M, Alotaibi N, Almubarak S Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47979.

PMID: 38034130 PMC: 10686238. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47979.

Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery: a dental hospital's 10-year experience.

Lee C, Yong C, Saigo L, Ren Y, Chew M Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 28(2):729-738.

PMID: 37996564 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-023-01194-y.

Face the Future-Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Miragall M, Knoedler S, Kauke-Navarro M, Saadoun R, Grabenhorst A, Grill F J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959310 PMC: 10649053. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216843.

The impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on facial expressions-a four-dimensional clinical trial.

Quast A, Sadlonova M, Asendorf T, Derad C, Mouchoux J, Horn J Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(10):5841-5851.

PMID: 37561212 PMC: 10560183. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05195-9.

References

Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber J, Christensen A, Lemoine J, Liebschner M . Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(4):728-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.001. View

Terajima M, Nakasima A, Aoki Y, Goto T, Tokumori K, Mori N . A 3-dimensional method for analyzing the morphology of patients with maxillofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(6):857-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.019. View

van Vlijmen O, Maal T, Berge S, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A . A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117(3):300-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00633.x. View

Hwang H, Hwang C, Lee K, Kang B . Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(6):779-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021. View

Bergeron L, Yu C, Chen Y . Single-splint technique for correction of severe facial asymmetry: correlation between intraoperative maxillomandibular complex roll and restoration of mouth symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(5):1535-1541. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818820d8. View

Lin H, Lo L . Three-dimensional computer-assisted surgical simulation and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery: a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015; 114(4):300-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.01.017. View

Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Bassi M, Gori R, Lamberti C, Sarti A . Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillo-facial virtual surgery (VISU). J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17(4):661-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200607000-00009. View

Patel P, Novia M . The surgical tools: the LeFort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible, and the osseous genioplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2007; 34(3):447-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.012. View

Bell R, Weimer K, Dierks E, Buehler M, Lubek J . Computer planning and intraoperative navigation for palatomaxillary and mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 69(3):724-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.040. View

10.

Shyagali T, Chandralekha B, Bhayya D, Kumar S, Balasubramanyam G . Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?. Aust Orthod J. 2008; 24(2):91-5. View

11.

Cevidanes L, Styner M, Proffit W . Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5):611-8. PMC: 3586191. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008. View

12.

Xia J, Shevchenko L, Gateno J, Teichgraeber J, Taylor T, Lasky R . Outcome study of computer-aided surgical simulation in the treatment of patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(7):2014-24. PMC: 3119456. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.018. View

13.

Johnston C, Burden D, Stevenson M . The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21(5):517-22. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.5.517. View

14.

van Heerbeek N, Ingels K, van Loon B, Plooij J, Berge S . Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results. Rhinology. 2009; 47(2):121-5. View

15.

Xia J, Ip H, Samman N, Wang D, Kot C, Yeung R . Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 29(1):11-7. View

16.

Bholsithi W, Tharanon W, Chintakanon K, Komolpis R, Sinthanayothin C . 3D vs. 2D cephalometric analysis comparisons with repeated measurements from 20 Thai males and 20 Thai females. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011; 5(4):e21. PMC: 3097714. DOI: 10.2349/biij.5.4.e21. View

17.

Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza M . Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(6):748-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.039. View

18.

Yu C, Bergeron L, Lin C, Chu Y, Chen Y . Single-splint technique in orthognathic surgery: intraoperative checkpoints to control facial symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(3):879-886. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03842. View

19.

Gordon C, Murphy R, Coon D, Basafa E, Otake Y, Al Rakan M . Preliminary development of a workstation for craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures: introducing a computer-assisted planning and execution system. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(1):273-83. PMC: 4028051. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000497. View

20.

Swennen G, Barth E, Eulzer C, Schutyser F . The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(2):146-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.019. View