» Articles » PMID: 27298653

Common and Uncommon Anatomical Variants of Intrahepatic Bile Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Its Clinical Implication

Overview
Journal Pol J Radiol
Publisher Termedia
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Jun 15
PMID 27298653
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Preoperative knowledge of intrahepatic bile duct (IHD) anatomy is critical for planning liver resections, liver transplantations and complex biliary reconstructive surgery. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the imaging features of various anatomical variants of IHD using magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) and their prevalence in our population.

Material/methods: This observational clinical evaluation study included 224 patients who were referred for MRCP. MRCP was performed in a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Philips) with SSH MRCP 3DHR and SSHMRCP rad protocol. A senior radiologist assessed the biliary passage for anatomical variations.

Results: The branching pattern of the right hepatic duct (RHD) was typical in 55.3% of subjects. The most common variant was right posterior sectoral duct (RPSD) draining into the left hepatic duct (LHD) in 27.6% of subjects. Trifurcation pattern was noted in 9.3% of subjects. In 4% of subjects, RPSD was draining into the common hepatic duct (CHD) and in 0.8% of subjects into the cystic duct. Other variants were noted in 2.6% of subjects. In 4.9% of cases there was an accessory duct. The most common type of LHD branching pattern was a common trunk of segment 2 and 3 ducts joining the segment 4 duct in 67.8% of subjects. In 23.2% of subjects, segment 2 duct united with the common trunk of segment 3 and 4 and in 3.4% of subjects segment 2, 3, and 4 ducts united together to form LHD. Other uncommon branching patterns of LHD were seen in 4.9% of subjects.

Conclusions: Intrahepatic bile duct anatomy is complex with many common and uncommon variations. MRCP is a reliable non-invasive imaging method for demonstration of bile duct morphology, which is useful to plan complex surgeries and to prevent iatrogenic injuries.

Citing Articles

Staged preoperative evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation.

Sotomayor C, Garcia D, Rebolledo P, Dominguez M, Pastore A, Achurra P Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025; 10:2.

PMID: 39944584 PMC: 11811558. DOI: 10.21037/tgh-24-65.


Benefits, problems, and optimal timing of administration of indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Kinami S, Maruyama K, Sannomiya Y, Saito H, Takamura H BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025; 7(1):e000310.

PMID: 39850740 PMC: 11751898. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310.


Clinical implications of aberrant anatomy of the common hepatic duct in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J, Avalos-Diaz C, Droguett-Utreras A, Guerra-Loyola J, Nova-Baeza P, Orellana-Donoso M Surg Radiol Anat. 2024; 46(12):2027-2047.

PMID: 39333309 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-024-03494-8.


Access and reattachment of biliary tree anomaly through Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy: A case report.

Cushman C, Ibrahim A, Rostas J, Montgomery J Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(8):3358-3362.

PMID: 38832338 PMC: 11145206. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.04.068.


The Frequency of Anatomical Variants of the Bile Ducts: A Review Based on a Single Classification as Support for Cholangiographic Examinations.

Olmedo N, Dos Santos J, Elias Junior J Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58905.

PMID: 38800324 PMC: 11118781. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58905.


References
1.
Chiang H, Hsu H, Chen P, Chiang H, Huang T, Chen T . Magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation: comparison of preenhanced and post-gadolinium-enhanced methods. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44(2):324-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.035. View

2.
Kostov D, Kobakov G . Six rare biliary tract anatomic variations: implications for liver surgery. Eurasian J Med. 2015; 43(2):67-72. PMC: 4261355. DOI: 10.5152/eajm.2011.16. View

3.
Hyodo T, Kumano S, Kushihata F, Okada M, Hirata M, Tsuda T . CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1015):887-96. PMC: 3474084. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21209407. View

4.
Karakas H, Celik T, Alicioglu B . Bile duct anatomy of the Anatolian Caucasian population: Huang classification revisited. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 30(7):539-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-008-0365-y. View

5.
Catalano O, Singh A, Uppot R, Hahn P, Ferrone C, Sahani D . Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: implications for liver surgery. Radiographics. 2008; 28(2):359-78. DOI: 10.1148/rg.282075099. View