» Articles » PMID: 12845303

Anatomic Variation in Intrahepatic Bile Ducts: an Analysis of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in 300 Consecutive Donors for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2003 Jul 8
PMID 12845303
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the anatomical variation occurring in intrahepatic bile ducts (IHDs) in terms of their branching patterns, and to determine the frequency of each variation.

Materials And Methods: The study group consisted of 300 consecutive donors for liver transplantation who underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Anatomical variation in IHDs was classified according to the branching pattern of the right anterior and right posterior segmental duct (RASD and RPSD, respectively), and the presence or absence of the first-order branch of the left hepatic duct (LHD), and of an accessory hepatic duct.

Results: The anatomy of the intrahepatic bile ducts was typical in 63% of cases (n=188), showed triple confluence in 10% (n=29), anomalous drainage of the RPSD into the LHD in 11% (n=34), anomalous drainage of the RPSD into the common hepatic duct (CHD) in 6% (n=19), anomalous drainage of the RPSD into the cystic duct in 2% (n=6), drainage of the right hepatic duct (RHD) into the cystic duct (n=1), the presence of an accessory duct leading to the CHD or RHD in 5% (n=16), individual drainage of the LHD into the RHD or CHD in 1% (n=4), and unclassified or complex variation in 1% (n=3).

Conclusion: The branching pattern of IHDs was atypical in 37% of cases. The two most common variations were drainage of the RPSD into the LHD (11%) and triple confluence of the RASD, RPSD and LHD (10%).

Citing Articles

Hepatic Hilum Variations and Their Clinical Considerations in the Liver: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J, Pena-Santibanez F, Vergara Salinas A, Meneses Caroca T, Rojo-Gonzalez J, Orellana-Donoso M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39459601 PMC: 11509691. DOI: 10.3390/life14101301.


Clinical implications of aberrant anatomy of the common hepatic duct in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J, Avalos-Diaz C, Droguett-Utreras A, Guerra-Loyola J, Nova-Baeza P, Orellana-Donoso M Surg Radiol Anat. 2024; 46(12):2027-2047.

PMID: 39333309 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-024-03494-8.


Access and reattachment of biliary tree anomaly through Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy: A case report.

Cushman C, Ibrahim A, Rostas J, Montgomery J Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(8):3358-3362.

PMID: 38832338 PMC: 11145206. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.04.068.


The Frequency of Anatomical Variants of the Bile Ducts: A Review Based on a Single Classification as Support for Cholangiographic Examinations.

Olmedo N, Dos Santos J, Elias Junior J Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58905.

PMID: 38800324 PMC: 11118781. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58905.


An Elbow Patch Reconstruction Technique for Narrowed Remnant Portal Veins during Right Lobe Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Rescue Surgery.

Usta S, Akbulut S, Sarici K, Garzali I, Ozdemir F, Gonultas F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792466 PMC: 11122611. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102924.


References
1.
Turner M, Fulcher A . The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. Radiographics. 2001; 21(1):3-22; questionnaire 288-94. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja093. View

2.
Mortele K, Ros P . Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(2):389-94. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770389. View

3.
Kim H, Kim M, Lee S, Seo D, Kim Y, Lee D . Normal structure, variations, and anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans: a nationwide cooperative prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55(7):889-96. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.124635. View

4.
Puente S, Bannura G . Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg. 1983; 7(2):271-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01656159. View

5.
Reid S, Cho S, Shaw C, Turner M . Anomalous hepatic duct inserting into the cystic duct. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 147(6):1181-2. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1181. View