» Articles » PMID: 27264532

The Impact of Marital Status at Diagnosis on Cancer Survival in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jun 7
PMID 27264532
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have revealed that marital status influences the prognosis of patients with various types of cancer. We evaluated the influence of marriage on the survival outcomes in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2002 and 2012 was used to compare cancer-specific mortality in different marital status, and in each sex, age, and stage stratification by multivariate Cox regression model. In total, 61,077 eligible patients were identified. The widowed group had the highest proportion of women, elderly patients (≥45 years), and advanced stage III/IV tumor (P = 0.001), but the total thyroidectomy (TT) performed and radioisotopes therapy rates were lower than those in the married group. Married patients had a better cancer-specific survival (CSS) than the unmarried (P < 0.05). Further analysis showed that widowed patients always presented the lowest CSS compared with other groups. Widowed patients had a significant increased risk for CSS compared with married patients in males [hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59-4.65, P = 0.001], females (HR 2.02, 95% CI: 2.24-4.06, P = 0.001), young patients (<45, HR 28.12, 95% CI: 3.48-227.25, P = 0.002), elderly patients (≥45, HR 28.12, 95% CI: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.30-3.83, P = 0.001), stage I (HR 8.44, 95% CI: 4.05-17.59, P = 0.001), stage II (HR 3.64, 95% CI: 1.30-10.20, P = 0.014), stage III (HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.08-4.78, P = 0.031), and stage IV (HR 2.63, 95% CI: 1.94-3.57, P = 0.001). These results showed that unmarried status, especially for widowhood, increased the risk of cancer mortality in DTC patients.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of survival nomograms for patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a SEER program-based study.

Chen X, Zhao P, He Y, Huang K, Zhao P, Liao F Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):650.

PMID: 39535681 PMC: 11561200. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01537-5.


Prognostic nomogram models for elderly patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population-based study.

Wang D, Yang Y, Yang H, He Y, Wang Z, Chen M Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(44):e40381.

PMID: 39496024 PMC: 11537660. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040381.


Enhancing clinical decision-making: A novel nomogram for stratifying cancer-specific survival in middle-aged individuals with follicular thyroid carcinoma utilizing SEER data.

Zhanghuang C, Wang J, Ji F, Yao Z, Ma J, Hang Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e31876.

PMID: 38841472 PMC: 11152935. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31876.


Natural History and Prognostic Model of Untreated Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.

Wang D, Yang Y, He Y, Yang H, Yang L Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241253956.

PMID: 38756002 PMC: 11102674. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241253956.


Development and validation of survival nomograms for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer with distant metastases: a SEER Program-based study.

Ma Q, Chen Z, Fang Y, Wei X, Wang N, Zhou X J Endocrinol Invest. 2023; 47(1):115-129.

PMID: 37294407 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02129-w.


References
1.
Antonelli A, Ferri C, Ferrari S, Di Domenicantonio A, Giuggioli D, Galleri D . Increased risk of papillary thyroid cancer in systemic sclerosis associated with autoimmune thyroiditis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 55(3):480-4. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev358. View

2.
Davies L, Welch H . Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA. 2006; 295(18):2164-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.18.2164. View

3.
Miller G, Cohen S, Ritchey A . Chronic psychological stress and the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines: a glucocorticoid-resistance model. Health Psychol. 2002; 21(6):531-41. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.21.6.531. View

4.
Goodwin J, Hunt W, Key C, Samet J . The effect of marital status on stage, treatment, and survival of cancer patients. JAMA. 1987; 258(21):3125-30. View

5.
Tyson M, Andrews P, Etzioni D, Ferrigni R, Humphreys M, Swanson S . Marital status and prostate cancer outcomes. Can J Urol. 2013; 20(2):6702-6. View