» Articles » PMID: 27222554

Identifying Barriers to Appropriate Use of Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Policy Lab Results

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 May 26
PMID 27222554
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite increasing recognition of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bariatric/metabolic surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, few patients who may be appropriate candidates and may benefit from this type of surgery avail themselves of this treatment option. To identify conceptual and practical barriers to appropriate use of surgical procedures, a Policy Lab was hosted at the 3rd World Congress on Interventional Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes on 29 September 2015. Twenty-six stakeholders participated in the Policy Lab, including academics, clinicians, policy-makers, industry leaders, and patient representatives. Participants were provided with a summary of available evidence about the cost-effectiveness of bariatric/metabolic surgery and the costs of increasing the use of bariatric/metabolic surgery, using U.K. and U.S. scenarios as examples of distinct health care systems. There was widespread agreement among this group of stakeholders that bariatric/metabolic surgery is a legitimate and cost-effective approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. The following four building blocks were identified to facilitate policy changes: 1) communicating the scale of the costs and harms associated with rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes; 2) properly articulating the role of bariatric/metabolic surgery for certain population groups; 3) identifying new funding sources for bariatric/metabolic surgery; and 4) incorporating bariatric/metabolic surgery into the appropriate clinical pathways. Although more research is needed to identify specific clinical scenarios for the prioritization of bariatric/metabolic surgery, the case appears to be strong enough to engage relevant policy-makers and practitioners in a concerted discussion of how to better use metabolic surgical resources in conjunction with other interventions in good diabetes practice.

Citing Articles

8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S145-S157.

PMID: 38078578 PMC: 10725806. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S008.


8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.

ElSayed N, Aleppo G, Aroda V, Bannuru R, Brown F, Bruemmer D Diabetes Care. 2022; 46(Suppl 1):S128-S139.

PMID: 36507637 PMC: 9810466. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-S008.


Cost-effectiveness of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Jordan K, Fawsitt C, Carty P, Clyne B, Teljeur C, Harrington P Eur J Health Econ. 2022; 24(4):575-590.

PMID: 35869383 PMC: 10175448. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01494-2.


Barriers to accessing weight-loss interventions for patients with class II or III obesity in primary care: a qualitative study.

Zevin B, Dalgarno N, Martin M, Grady C, Matusinec J, Houlden R CMAJ Open. 2019; 7(4):E738-E744.

PMID: 31836631 PMC: 6910138. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190072.


Evaluation and Management of Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.

Arslanian S, Bacha F, Grey M, Marcus M, White N, Zeitler P Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(12):2648-2668.

PMID: 30425094 PMC: 7732108. DOI: 10.2337/dci18-0052.


References
1.
Keating C, Dixon J, Moodie M, Peeters A, Bulfone L, Maglianno D . Cost-effectiveness of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: modeled lifetime analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(4):567-74. PMC: 2660478. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1749. View

2.
Chawla A, Hsiao C, Romney M, Cohen R, Rubino F, Schauer P . Gap Between Evidence and Patient Access: Policy Implications for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015; 33(7):629-41. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0302-y. View

3.
Foster G, Wadden T, Makris A, Davidson D, Sanderson R, Allison D . Primary care physicians' attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res. 2003; 11(10):1168-77. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.161. View

4.
Bays H, Chapman R, Grandy S . The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys. Int J Clin Pract. 2007; 61(5):737-47. PMC: 1890993. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01336.x. View

5.
Pan L, Freedman D, Gillespie C, Park S, Sherry B . Incidences of obesity and extreme obesity among US adults: findings from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Popul Health Metr. 2011; 9(1):56. PMC: 3217879. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-56. View