» Articles » PMID: 27216053

Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection in a California Tertiary Medical Center

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 May 25
PMID 27216053
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent observational studies have suggested possible reductions in mortality in patients receiving cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins. We examined 90-day mortality in patients receiving cefazolin compared to nafcillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infection (BSI). We identified persons with MSSA BSI admitted to San Francisco General Hospital from January 2008 to July 2013 through a hospital-wide infection surveillance system and confirmed 90-day mortality using U.S. national vital registries. We included persons receiving cefazolin or nafcillin as the predominant intravenous antimicrobial agent; all participants received inpatient Infectious Diseases service consultation. We estimated the association between receipt of cefazolin and 90-day risk of death by multivariate logistic regression, including a propensity score for receiving cefazolin as the second predictor. Of 230 MSSA BSI cases, 30 received nafcillin and 70 received cefazolin as the predominant antimicrobial; 10 died within 90 days, 5 from each group. Unadjusted analysis showed substantial but not statistically significant reduced odds of death in those receiving cefazolin (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 1.44). Multivariate analysis with propensity scores found a similar adjusted odds ratio (0.40; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.74; P = 0.22). We found a large reduction in 90-day mortality in those receiving cefazolin compared to nafcillin for MSSA BSI, but this finding was not statistically significant. The magnitude of effect seen in this and other studies justifies further study.

Citing Articles

Cephalotin Versus Dicloxacillin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Bacteraemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Quinonez-Flores A, Martinez-Guerra B, Roman-Montes C, Tamez-Torres K, Gonzalez-Lara M, Ponce-de-Leon A Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38391562 PMC: 10885996. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13020176.


The Relationship Between Antibiotic Agent and Mortality in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia due to Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Aleissa M, Gonzalez-Bocco I, Zekery-Saad S, Kubiak D, Zhang E, Signorelli J Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(8):ofac306.

PMID: 35949404 PMC: 9356691. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac306.


Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused by : A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.

Giacobbe D, Dettori S, Corcione S, Vena A, Sepulcri C, Maraolo A Infect Drug Resist. 2022; 15:2137-2157.

PMID: 35498629 PMC: 9041368. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S318322.


The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Bacteremia.

Pliakos E, Ziakas P, Mylonakis E Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021; 8(11):ofab476.

PMID: 34746331 PMC: 8566905. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab476.


Antistaphylococcal penicillins vs. cefazolin in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a quasi-experimental monocentre study.

Lefevre B, Hoen B, Goehringer F, Sime W, Aissa N, Alauzet C Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 40(12):2605-2616.

PMID: 34383175 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04313-3.


References
1.
Bai A, Showler A, Burry L, Steinberg M, Ricciuto D, Fernandes T . Comparative effectiveness of cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for MSSA bacteraemia: results from a large multicentre cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 70(5):1539-46. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku560. View

2.
Coombs G, Nimmo G, Daly D, Le T, Pearson J, Tan H . Australian Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Outcome Programme annual report, 2013. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2015; 38(4):E309-19. View

3.
Naber C, Baddour L, Giamarellos-Bourboulis E, Gould I, Herrmann M, Hoen B . Clinical consensus conference: survey on Gram-positive bloodstream infections with a focus on Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48 Suppl 4:S260-70. DOI: 10.1086/598185. View

4.
Baddour L, Wilson W, Bayer A, Fowler Jr V, Bolger A, Levison M . Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the.... Circulation. 2005; 111(23):e394-434. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165564. View

5.
Robinson J, Pozzi-Langhi S, Phillips M, Pearson J, Christiansen K, Coombs G . Formal infectious diseases consultation is associated with decreased mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 31(9):2421-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-012-1585-y. View