» Articles » PMID: 27213023

VARIABLE SELECTION AND PREDICTION WITH INCOMPLETE HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA

Overview
Journal Ann Appl Stat
Date 2016 May 24
PMID 27213023
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We propose a Multiple Imputation Random Lasso (mirl) method to select important variables and to predict the outcome for an epidemiological study of Eating and Activity in Teens. In this study 80% of individuals have at least one variable missing. Therefore, using variable selection methods developed for complete data after listwise deletion substantially reduces prediction power. Recent work on prediction models in the presence of incomplete data cannot adequately account for large numbers of variables with arbitrary missing patterns. We propose MIRL to combine penalized regression techniques with multiple imputation and stability selection. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to compare MIRL with several alternatives. MIRL outperforms other methods in high-dimensional scenarios in terms of both reduced prediction error and improved variable selection performance, and it has greater advantage when the correlation among variables is high and missing proportion is high. MIRL is shown to have improved performance when comparing with other applicable methods when applied to the study of Eating and Activity in Teens for the boys and girls separately, and to a subgroup of low social economic status (ses) Asian boys who are at high risk of developing obesity.

Citing Articles

Multi-omics regulatory network inference in the presence of missing data.

Henao J, Lauber M, Azevedo M, Grekova A, Theis F, List M Brief Bioinform. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 37670505 PMC: 10516394. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad309.


Variable selection with multiply-imputed datasets: choosing between stacked and grouped methods.

Du J, Boss J, Han P, Beesley L, Kleinsasser M, Goutman S J Comput Graph Stat. 2023; 31(4):1063-1075.

PMID: 36644406 PMC: 9838615. DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2035739.


How to apply variable selection machine learning algorithms with multiply imputed data: A missing discussion.

Gunn H, Rezvan P, Fernandez M, Comulada W Psychol Methods. 2022; 28(2):452-471.

PMID: 35113633 PMC: 10117422. DOI: 10.1037/met0000478.


Structure and stability of symptoms in first episode psychosis: a longitudinal network approach.

Griffiths S, Leighton S, Mallikarjun P, Blake G, Everard L, Jones P Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1):567.

PMID: 34743179 PMC: 8572227. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01687-y.


Health system influences on potentially avoidable hospital admissions by secondary mental health service use: A national ecological study.

Woodhead C, Martin P, Osborn D, Barratt H, Raine R J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021; 27(1):22-30.

PMID: 34337981 PMC: 8772012. DOI: 10.1177/13558196211036739.


References
1.
Ibrahim J, Zhu H, Garcia R, Guo R . Fixed and random effects selection in mixed effects models. Biometrics. 2010; 67(2):495-503. PMC: 3041932. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01463.x. View

2.
Azur M, Stuart E, Frangakis C, Leaf P . Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011; 20(1):40-9. PMC: 3074241. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.329. View

3.
Wood A, White I, Royston P . How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?. Stat Med. 2008; 27(17):3227-46. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3177. View

4.
Laird N, Ware J . Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982; 38(4):963-74. View

5.
Johnson B, Lin D, Zeng D . Penalized Estimating Functions and Variable Selection in Semiparametric Regression Models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010; 103(482):672-680. PMC: 2850080. DOI: 10.1198/016214508000000184. View