» Articles » PMID: 27195306

User-composable Electronic Health Record Improves Efficiency of Clinician Data Viewing for Patient Case Appraisal: A Mixed-Methods Study

Overview
Journal EGEMS (Wash DC)
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2016 May 20
PMID 27195306
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Challenges in the design of electronic health records (EHRs) include designing usable systems that must meet the complex, rapidly changing, and high-stakes information needs of clinicians. The ability to move and assemble elements together on the same page has significant human-computer interaction (HCI) and efficiency advantages, and can mitigate the problems of negotiating multiple fixed screens and the associated cognitive burdens.

Objective: We compare MedWISE-a novel EHR that supports user-composable displays-with a conventional EHR in terms of the number of repeat views of data elements for patient case appraisal.

Design And Methods: The study used mixed-methods for examination of clinical data viewing in four patient cases. The study compared use of an experimental user-composable EHR with use of a conventional EHR, for case appraisal. Eleven clinicians used a user-composable EHR in a case appraisal task in the laboratory setting. This was compared with log file analysis of the same patient cases in the conventional EHR. We investigated the number of repeat views of the same clinical information during a session and across these two contexts, and compared them using Fisher's exact test.

Results: There was a significant difference (p<.0001) in proportion of cases with repeat data element viewing between the user-composable EHR (14.6 percent) and conventional EHR (72.6 percent).

Discussion And Conclusion: Users of conventional EHRs repeatedly viewed the same information elements in the same session, as revealed by log files. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that conventional systems require that the user view many screens and remember information between screens, causing the user to forget information and to have to access the information a second time. Other mechanisms (such as reduction in navigation over a population of users due to interface sharing, and information selection) may also contribute to increased efficiency in the experimental system. Systems that allow a composable approach that enables the user to gather together on the same screen any desired information elements may confer cognitive support benefits that can increase productive use of systems by reducing fragmented information. By reducing cognitive overload, it can also enhance the user experience.

Citing Articles

The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.

Cahill M, Cleary B, Cullinan S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39762805 PMC: 11705737. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.


Impact of a Disease-Focused Electronic Health Record Dashboard on Clinical Staff Efficiency in Previsit Patient Review in an Ambulatory Pulmonary Hypertension Care Clinic.

Koirala T, Burger C, Chaudhry R, Benitez P, Heaton H, Gopikrishnan N Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):928-938.

PMID: 39505008 PMC: 11540472. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790552.


A Longitudinal Comparison of Pharmacy Documentation Platforms Using the Technology Acceptance Model: Experiences With Opioid Risk Screening.

Frenzel O, Strand M, Welsh A, Eukel H, Skoy E, Steig J J Pharm Technol. 2023; 39(1):3-9.

PMID: 36755758 PMC: 9899959. DOI: 10.1177/87551225221128207.


The Impact of Electronic Health Record-Based Simulation During Intern Boot Camp: Interventional Study.

Miller M, Scholl G, Corby S, Mohan V, Gold J JMIR Med Educ. 2021; 7(1):e25828.

PMID: 33687339 PMC: 8081274. DOI: 10.2196/25828.


Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review.

Moy A, Schwartz J, Chen R, Sadri S, Lucas E, Cato K J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 28(5):998-1008.

PMID: 33434273 PMC: 8068426. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa325.


References
1.
Hripcsak G, Cimino J, Sengupta S . WebCIS: large scale deployment of a Web-based clinical information system. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; :804-8. PMC: 2232714. View

2.
Oxentenko A, West C, Popkave C, Weinberger S, Kolars J . Time spent on clinical documentation: a survey of internal medicine residents and program directors. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(4):377-80. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.534. View

3.
Horsky J, Kaufman D, Oppenheim M, Patel V . A framework for analyzing the cognitive complexity of computer-assisted clinical ordering. J Biomed Inform. 2003; 36(1-2):4-22. DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00062-5. View

4.
Hazlehurst B, McMullen C, Gorman P . Distributed cognition in the heart room: how situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery. J Biomed Inform. 2007; 40(5):539-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.02.001. View

5.
Kushniruk A, Patel V . Cognitive evaluation of decision making processes and assessment of information technology in medicine. Int J Med Inform. 1998; 51(2-3):83-90. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00106-3. View