» Articles » PMID: 27167263

Radiation Doses and Estimated Risk from Angiographic Projections During Coronary Angiography Performed Using Novel Flat Detector

Overview
Date 2016 May 12
PMID 27167263
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coronary angiography (CA) procedure uses various angiographic projections to elicit detailed information of the coronary arteries with some steep projections involving high radiation dose to patients. This study intends to evaluate radiation doses and estimated risk from angiographic projections during CA procedure performed using novel flat detector (FD) system with improved image processing and noise reduction techniques. Real-time monitoring of radiation doses using kerma-area product (KAP) meter was performed for 140 patients using Philips Clarity FD system. The CA procedure involved seven standard projections, of which five were extensively selected by interventionalists. Mean fluoroscopic time (FT), KAP, and reference air kerma (Ka,r) for CA procedure were 3.24 min (0.5-10.51), 13.99Gycm2 (4.02-37.6), and 231.43 mGy (73.8-622.15), respectively. Effective dose calculated using Monte Carlo-based PCXMC software was found to be 4.9mSv. Left anterior oblique (LAO) 45° projection contributed the highest radiation dose (28%) of the overall KAP. Radiation-induced risk was found to be higher in females compared to males with increased risk of lung cancer. An increase of 10%-15% in radiation dose was observed when one or more additional projections were adopted along with the seven standard projections. A 14% reduction of radiation dose was achieved from novel FD system when low-dose protocol during fluoroscopy and medium-dose protocol during cine acquisitions were adopted, compared to medium-dose protocol.

Citing Articles

Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study.

Subban V, Amelot S, Victor S, Potdar A, Yadav V, Patel T AsiaIntervention. 2021; 6(1):25-33.

PMID: 34912981 PMC: 8525728. DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-18-00044.


Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Buytaert D, Drieghe B, Van Heuverswyn F, De Pooter J, Gheeraert P, De Wolf D J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(13):e014683.

PMID: 32605408 PMC: 7670532. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014683.


Radiation dose reference card for interventional radiology procedures: Experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Varghese A, Keshava S, Moses V, Koshy G, Mammen S, Ahmed M Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2019; 29(3):247-252.

PMID: 31741591 PMC: 6857258. DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_35_19.


Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Osei B, Xu L, Johnston A, Darko S, Darko J, Osei E Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1099):20181021.

PMID: 31045448 PMC: 6636266. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181021.


Impact of the Ceiling-Mounted Radiation Shielding Position on the Physician's Dose from Scatter Radiation during Interventional Procedures.

Sukupova L, Hlavacek O, Vedlich D Radiol Res Pract. 2018; 2018:4287973.

PMID: 29666706 PMC: 5831950. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4287973.


References
1.
de Bono D . Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of.... Br Heart J. 1993; 70(3):297-300. PMC: 1025320. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.70.3.297. View

2.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

3.
Chambers C, Fetterly K, Holzer R, Lin P, Blankenship J, Balter S . Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 77(4):546-56. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22867. View

4.
Broadhead D, Chapple C, Faulkner K, Davies M, McCallum H . The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70(833):492-7. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227231. View

5.
Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dahm J . Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89(1):44-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02161-0. View