» Articles » PMID: 27150637

Multisensory Aversive Stimuli Differentially Modulate Negative Feelings in Near and Far Space

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 May 7
PMID 27150637
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Affect, space, and multisensory integration are processes that are closely linked. However, it is unclear whether the spatial location of emotional stimuli interacts with multisensory presentation to influence the emotional experience they induce in the perceiver. In this study, we used the unique advantages of virtual reality techniques to present potentially aversive crowd stimuli embedded in a natural context and to control their display in terms of sensory and spatial presentation. Individuals high in crowdphobic fear navigated in an auditory-visual virtual environment, in which they encountered virtual crowds presented through the visual channel, the auditory channel, or both. They reported the intensity of their negative emotional experience at a far distance and at a close distance from the crowd stimuli. Whereas auditory-visual presentation of close feared stimuli amplified negative feelings, auditory-visual presentation of distant feared stimuli did not amplify negative feelings. This suggests that spatial closeness allows multisensory processes to modulate the intensity of the emotional experience induced by aversive stimuli. Nevertheless, the specific role of auditory stimulation must be investigated to better understand this interaction between multisensory, affective, and spatial representation processes. This phenomenon may serve the implementation of defensive behaviors in response to aversive stimuli that are in position to threaten an individual's feeling of security.

Citing Articles

Gradual exposure to Coriolis force induces sensorimotor adaptation with no change in peripersonal space.

Leclere N, Sarlegna F, Coello Y, Bourdin C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):922.

PMID: 35042915 PMC: 8766485. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04961-1.


Contextual modulation of preferred social distance during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fini C, Tummolini L, Borghi A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23726.

PMID: 34887441 PMC: 8660879. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02905-9.


Personalized Virtual Reality Human-Computer Interaction for Psychiatric and Neurological Illnesses: A Dynamically Adaptive Virtual Reality Environment That Changes According to Real-Time Feedback From Electrophysiological Signal Responses.

Kritikos J, Alevizopoulos G, Koutsouris D Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:596980.

PMID: 33643010 PMC: 7906990. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.596980.

References
1.
Gondan M, Niederhaus B, Rosler F, Roder B . Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 67(4):713-26. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193527. View

2.
Watson R, Latinus M, Noguchi T, Garrod O, Crabbe F, Belin P . Crossmodal adaptation in right posterior superior temporal sulcus during face-voice emotional integration. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(20):6813-21. PMC: 4019796. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4478-13.2014. View

3.
Mobbs D, Petrovic P, Marchant J, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Seymour B . When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science. 2007; 317(5841):1079-83. PMC: 2648508. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144298. View

4.
Phillips M, Drevets W, Rauch S, Lane R . Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54(5):504-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9. View

5.
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V . The space around us. Science. 1997; 277(5323):190-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5323.190. View