» Articles » PMID: 23986256

Better Safe Than Sorry? The Safety Margin Surrounding the Body is Increased by Anxiety

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Aug 30
PMID 23986256
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The defensive peripersonal space represents a "safety margin" advantageous for survival. Its spatial extension and the possible relationship with personality traits have never been investigated. Here, in a population of 15 healthy human participants, we show that the defensive peripersonal space has a sharp boundary, located between 20 and 40 cm from the face, and that within such space there is a thin, "highest-risk area" closest to the face (i.e., an "ultra-near" defensive space). Single-subject analysis revealed clear interindividual differences in the extension of such peripersonal space. These differences are positively related to individual variability in trait anxiety. These findings point to the potential for measuring a range of defensive behaviors in relation to individual levels of anxiety. Such measures will allow developing procedures to test risk assessment abilities, particularly in professions that require reacting quickly to aversive stimuli near the body, such as firemen, policemen, and military officers. This may also lead to possible interventions to improve their performance under pressure.

Citing Articles

Your space or mine: Trait anxiety affects the peripersonal space plasticity in a social context.

Ferroni F, Gallese V, Rastelli F, Ardizzi M iScience. 2025; 28(2):111683.

PMID: 40061052 PMC: 11889492. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111683.


No cardiac phase bias for threat-related distance perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality.

Klotzsche F, Motyka P, Molak A, Sahula V, Darmova B, Byrnes C R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):241072.

PMID: 39479236 PMC: 11521594. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241072.


Emotion-gaze interaction affects time-to-collision estimates, but not preferred interpersonal distance towards looming faces.

Yamasaki D, Nagai M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1414702.

PMID: 39323584 PMC: 11423545. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414702.


The space between us: The effect of perceived threat on discomfort distance and perceived pleasantness of interpersonal vicarious touch.

Abra Y, Mirams L, Fairhurst M Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36487.

PMID: 39262966 PMC: 11388568. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36487.


Peripersonal space: why so last-second?.

de Vignemont F, Farne A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1911):20230159.

PMID: 39155714 PMC: 11529623. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0159.


References
1.
Lloyd D, Morrison I, Roberts N . Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 95(1):205-14. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00614.2005. View

2.
Lourenco S, Longo M, Pathman T . Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear. Cognition. 2011; 119(3):448-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.009. View

3.
Combe E, Fujii N . Depth perception and defensive system activation in a 3-d environment. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:205. PMC: 3171069. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00205. View

4.
Blanchard D, Griebel G, Pobbe R, Blanchard R . Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 35(4):991-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.016. View

5.
Xiao Y, Van Bavel J . See your friends close and your enemies closer: social identity and identity threat shape the representation of physical distance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012; 38(7):959-72. DOI: 10.1177/0146167212442228. View