» Articles » PMID: 27145905

Devices for Self-Monitoring Sedentary Time or Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2016 May 6
PMID 27145905
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is well documented that meeting the guideline levels (150 minutes per week) of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) is protective against chronic disease. Conversely, emerging evidence indicates the deleterious effects of prolonged sitting. Therefore, there is a need to change both behaviors. Self-monitoring of behavior is one of the most robust behavior-change techniques available. The growing number of technologies in the consumer electronics sector provides a unique opportunity for individuals to self-monitor their behavior.

Objective: The aim of this study is to review the characteristics and measurement properties of currently available self-monitoring devices for sedentary time and/or PA.

Methods: To identify technologies, four scientific databases were systematically searched using key terms related to behavior, measurement, and population. Articles published through October 2015 were identified. To identify technologies from the consumer electronic sector, systematic searches of three Internet search engines were also performed through to October 1, 2015.

Results: The initial database searches identified 46 devices and the Internet search engines identified 100 devices yielding a total of 146 technologies. Of these, 64 were further removed because they were currently unavailable for purchase or there was no evidence that they were designed for, had been used in, or could readily be modified for self-monitoring purposes. The remaining 82 technologies were included in this review (73 devices self-monitored PA, 9 devices self-monitored sedentary time). Of the 82 devices included, this review identified no published articles in which these devices were used for the purpose of self-monitoring PA and/or sedentary behavior; however, a number of technologies were found via Internet searches that matched the criteria for self-monitoring and provided immediate feedback on PA (ActiGraph Link, Microsoft Band, and Garmin Vivofit) and sedentary time (activPAL VT, the Lumo Back, and Darma).

Conclusions: There are a large number of devices that self-monitor PA; however, there is a greater need for the development of tools to self-monitor sedentary time. The novelty of these devices means they have yet to be used in behavior change interventions, although the growing field of wearable technology may facilitate this to change.

Citing Articles

Step Count Accuracy of the Life Plus Connected Watch at Different Localizations and Speeds in Healthy Adults, Patients With Cardiovascular Disease, and Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Step Count Validation Study in Laboratory Settings.

Heizmann A, Ollier E, Labeix P, Goujon I, Roche F, Le Hello C JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e58964.

PMID: 39930990 PMC: 11833183. DOI: 10.2196/58964.


Promoting Physical Activity Among Health Professional Students, Faculty, and Staff Members: A Competition-Based Intervention.

Zou C, Hollingsworth J, Farrell R, Fox B Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241279170.

PMID: 39554954 PMC: 11562360. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241279170.


Use of Wearable Activity-Monitoring Technologies to Promote Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Cancer Care.

Keats M, Yu X, Sweeney Magee M, Forbes C, Grandy S, Sweeney E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(6).

PMID: 36981693 PMC: 10048707. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20064784.


Defining Valid Activity Monitor Data: A Multimethod Analysis of Weight-Loss Intervention Participants' Barriers to Wear and First 100 Days of Physical Activity.

Orstad S, Gerchow L, Patel N, Reddy M, Hernandez C, Wilson D Informatics (MDPI). 2022; 8(2).

PMID: 36530339 PMC: 9754231. DOI: 10.3390/informatics8020039.


Associations of accelerometer measured school- and non-school based physical activity and sedentary time with body mass index: IPEN Adolescent study.

Van Dyck D, Barnett A, Cerin E, Conway T, Esteban-Cornejo I, Hinckson E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022; 19(1):85.

PMID: 35836235 PMC: 9284738. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01324-x.


References
1.
Carver C, Scheier M . Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982; 92(1):111-35. View

2.
Takacs J, Pollock C, Guenther J, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt M . Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport. 2013; 17(5):496-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.241. View

3.
Herrmann S, Hart T, Lee C, Ainsworth B . Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 45(2):109-13. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182. View

4.
Bonomi A, Plasqui G, Goris A, Westerterp K . Estimation of free-living energy expenditure using a novel activity monitor designed to minimize obtrusiveness. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010; 18(9):1845-51. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.34. View

5.
OKane M, Bunting B, Copeland M, Coates V . Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008; 336(7654):1174-7. PMC: 2394643. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39534.571644.BE. View