Cortical Thickness of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Strategic Choices in Economic Games

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2016 May 4

PMID 27140622

Citations 47

Authors

Toshio Yamagishi

Haruto Takagishi

Alan de Souza Rodrigues Fermin

Ryota Kanai

Yang Li

Yoshie Matsumoto

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human prosociality has been traditionally explained in the social sciences in terms of internalized social norms. Recent neuroscientific studies extended this traditional view of human prosociality by providing evidence that prosocial choices in economic games require cognitive control of the impulsive pursuit of self-interest. However, this view is challenged by an intuitive prosociality view emphasizing the spontaneous and heuristic basis of prosocial choices in economic games. We assessed the brain structure of 411 players of an ultimatum game (UG) and a dictator game (DG) and measured the strategic reasoning ability of 386. According to the reflective norm-enforcement view of prosociality, only those capable of strategically controlling their selfish impulses give a fair share in the UG, but cognitive control capability should not affect behavior in the DG. Conversely, we support the intuitive prosociality view by showing for the first time, to our knowledge, that strategic reasoning and cortical thickness of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were not related to giving in the UG but were negatively related to giving in the DG. This implies that the uncontrolled choice in the DG is prosocial rather than selfish, and those who have a thicker dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and are capable of strategic reasoning (goal-directed use of the theory of mind) control this intuitive drive for prosociality as a means to maximize reward when there are no future implications of choices.

Citing Articles

Neural synchronization and its impact on intergroup attitudes in dynamic interactions.

Lei Y, Liu S, Guo X, Zuo B, Wen F Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):312.

PMID: 40011759 PMC: 11865305. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07776-8.

Multimodal Imaging to Identify Brain Markers of Human Prosocial Behavior.

Ishihara T, Tanaka H, Kiyonari T, Matsuda T, Takagishi H eNeuro. 2025; 12(3).

PMID: 40011052 PMC: 11884870. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0304-24.2025.

Gender differences in dictator giving: A high-power laboratory test.

Barreda-Tarrazona I, Jaramillo-Gutierrez A, Pavan M, Sabater-Grande G PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317886.

PMID: 39937753 PMC: 11819478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317886.

A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.

Zajkowski W, Badman R, Haruno M, Akaishi R Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):127.

PMID: 39715935 PMC: 11666775. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3.

Frontoparietal network topology as a neural marker of musical perceptual abilities.

Lumaca M, Keller P, Baggio G, Pando-Naude V, Bajada C, Martinez M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8160.

PMID: 39289390 PMC: 11408523. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52479-z.

References

Weygandt M, Mai K, Dommes E, Leupelt V, Hackmack K, Kahnt T . The role of neural impulse control mechanisms for dietary success in obesity. Neuroimage. 2013; 83:669-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.028. View

Takagishi H, Fujii T, Koizumi M, Schug J, Nakamura F, Kameshima S . The development of the effect of peer monitoring on generosity differs among elementary school-age boys and girls. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:895. PMC: 4483517. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00895. View

Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E . Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science. 2006; 314(5800):829-32. DOI: 10.1126/science.1129156. View

Apperly I, Carroll D, Samson D, Humphreys G, Qureshi A, Moffitt G . Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults' ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 63(6):1201-17. DOI: 10.1080/17470210903281582. View

Baumgartner T, Knoch D, Hotz P, Eisenegger C, Fehr E . Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(11):1468-74. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2933. View

Knoch D, Nitsche M, Fischbacher U, Eisenegger C, Pascual-Leone A, Fehr E . Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation--the example of punishing unfairness. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 18(9):1987-90. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm237. View

ROCH , Lane , Samuelson , Allison , Dent . Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000; 83(2):185-212. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2915. View

Steinbeis N, Bernhardt B, Singer T . Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron. 2012; 73(5):1040-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027. View

Sanfey A, Rilling J, Aronson J, Nystrom L, Cohen J . The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science. 2003; 300(5626):1755-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1082976. View

10.

Espin A, Branas-Garza P, Herrmann B, Gamella J . Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1749):4923-8. PMC: 3497246. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2043. View

11.

Bear A, Rand D . Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(4):936-41. PMC: 4743833. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517780113. View

12.

Hare T, Camerer C, Rangel A . Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science. 2009; 324(5927):646-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1168450. View

13.

Fujii T, Takagishi H, Koizumi M, Okada H . The effect of direct and indirect monitoring on generosity among preschoolers. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:9025. PMC: 4356952. DOI: 10.1038/srep09025. View

14.

Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson E, Krosch A, Lisanby S, Fehr E . Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(5):538-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2516. View

15.

Yamagishi T, Horita Y, Takagishi H, Shinada M, Tanida S, Cook K . The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(28):11520-3. PMC: 2703666. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900636106. View

16.

Dalwani M, Sakai J, Mikulich-Gilbertson S, Tanabe J, Raymond K, McWilliams S . Reduced cortical gray matter volume in male adolescents with substance and conduct problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 118(2-3):295-305. PMC: 3170449. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.04.006. View

17.

Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E . Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(1):1-15. PMC: 2937159. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010. View

18.

Morishima Y, Schunk D, Bruhin A, Ruff C, Fehr E . Linking brain structure and activation in temporoparietal junction to explain the neurobiology of human altruism. Neuron. 2012; 75(1):73-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.021. View

19.

Miller E, Cohen J . An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24:167-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167. View

20.

Lotz S . Spontaneous Giving under Structural Inequality: Intuition Promotes Cooperation in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0131562. PMC: 4496099. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131562. View