» Articles » PMID: 27129791

Students' Drinking Behavior and Perceptions Towards Introducing Alcohol Policies on University Campus in Denmark: a Focus Group Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 May 1
PMID 27129791
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High alcohol consumption among university students is a well-researched health concern in many countries. At universities in Denmark, policies of alcohol consumption are a new phenomenon if existing at all. However, little is known of how students perceive campus alcohol policies. The aim of this study is to explore students' perceptions of alcohol policies on campus in relation to attitudes and practices of alcohol consumption.

Methods: We conducted six focus group interviews with students from the University of Southern Denmark at two different campuses. The interviews discussed topics such as experiences and attitudes towards alcohol consumption among students, regulations, and norms of alcohol use on campus. The analysis followed a pre-determined codebook.

Results: Alcohol consumption is an integrated practice on campus. Most of the participants found it unnecessary to make major restrictions. Instead, regulations were socially controlled by students themselves and related to what was considered to be appropriate behavior. However students were open minded towards smaller limitations of alcohol availability. These included banning the sale of alcohol in vending machines and limiting consumption during the introduction week primarily due to avoiding social exclusion of students who do not drink. Some international students perceived the level of consumption as too high and distinguished between situations where they perceived drinking as unusual.

Conclusion: The study showed that alcohol is a central part of students' lives. When developing and implementing alcohol policies on campus, seeking student input in the process and addressing alcohol policies in the larger community will likely improve the success of the policies.

Citing Articles

Student drinking cultures in tertiary education residential accommodation: A contextual research study.

Leontini R, Corney T Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023; 40(3):270-286.

PMID: 37255609 PMC: 10225963. DOI: 10.1177/14550725221143169.


Exploring the influence of local alcohol availability on drinking norms and practices: A qualitative scoping review.

Dimova E, Lekkas P, Maxwell K, Clemens T, Pearce J, Mitchell R Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023; 42(3):691-703.

PMID: 36657792 PMC: 10946767. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13596.


College students' perspectives on an alcohol prevention programme and student drinking - A focus group study.

Calnan S, Davoren M Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022; 39(3):301-321.

PMID: 35720519 PMC: 9152229. DOI: 10.1177/14550725211007078.


Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.

Howse E, Cullerton K, Grunseit A, Bohn-Goldbaum E, Bauman A, Freeman B Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):26.

PMID: 35246170 PMC: 8895540. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.


Counselling toward reducing alcohol use, knowledge about its morbidity and personal consumption among students of medical and dental courses in north-western Spain.

Perez-Gonzalez A, Lorenzo-Pouso A, Gandara-Vila P, Blanco-Carrion A, Somoza-Martin J, Garcia-Carnicero T Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021; 27(1):e59-e67.

PMID: 34704978 PMC: 8719783. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24950.


References
1.
Nelson T, Toomey T, Lenk K, Erickson D, Winters K . Implementation of NIAAA College Drinking Task Force recommendations: how are colleges doing 6 years later?. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010; 34(10):1687-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01268.x. View

2.
Rabiee F . Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2005; 63(4):655-60. DOI: 10.1079/pns2004399. View

3.
Toomey T, Wagenaar A . Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: options and research findings. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):193-205. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.193. View

4.
Saltz R, Paschall M, McGaffigan R, Nygaard P . Alcohol risk management in college settings: the safer California universities randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(6):491-9. PMC: 3085398. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.020. View

5.
Gronkjaer M, Curtis T, de Crespigny C, Delmar C . Drinking contexts and the legitimacy of alcohol use: findings from a focus group study on alcohol use in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2013; 41(3):221-9. DOI: 10.1177/1403494812472266. View