» Articles » PMID: 27113635

A Specialized Face-processing Model Inspired by the Organization of Monkey Face Patches Explains Several Face-specific Phenomena Observed in Humans

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Apr 27
PMID 27113635
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Converging reports indicate that face images are processed through specialized neural networks in the brain -i.e. face patches in monkeys and the fusiform face area (FFA) in humans. These studies were designed to find out how faces are processed in visual system compared to other objects. Yet, the underlying mechanism of face processing is not completely revealed. Here, we show that a hierarchical computational model, inspired by electrophysiological evidence on face processing in primates, is able to generate representational properties similar to those observed in monkey face patches (posterior, middle and anterior patches). Since the most important goal of sensory neuroscience is linking the neural responses with behavioral outputs, we test whether the proposed model, which is designed to account for neural responses in monkey face patches, is also able to predict well-documented behavioral face phenomena observed in humans. We show that the proposed model satisfies several cognitive face effects such as: composite face effect and the idea of canonical face views. Our model provides insights about the underlying computations that transfer visual information from posterior to anterior face patches.

Citing Articles

Emergence of brain-like mirror-symmetric viewpoint tuning in convolutional neural networks.

Farzmahdi A, Zarco W, Freiwald W, Kriegeskorte N, Golan T Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38661128 PMC: 11142642. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90256.


Behavioral signatures of face perception emerge in deep neural networks optimized for face recognition.

Dobs K, Yuan J, Martinez J, Kanwisher N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(32):e2220642120.

PMID: 37523537 PMC: 10410721. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220642120.


Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.

Groh M, Epstein Z, Firestone C, Picard R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 119(1).

PMID: 34969837 PMC: 8740705. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110013119.


A Recurrent Temporal Model for Semantic Levels Categorization Based on Human Visual System.

Karimi M, Ebrahimpour R, Bagheri N Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021; 2021:8895579.

PMID: 34012465 PMC: 8102126. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8895579.


A temporal hierarchical feedforward model explains both the time and the accuracy of object recognition.

Heidari-Gorji H, Ebrahimpour R, Zabbah S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5640.

PMID: 33707537 PMC: 7970968. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85198-2.


References
1.
Rossion B, Delvenne J, Debatisse D, Goffaux V, Bruyer R, Crommelinck M . Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biol Psychol. 1999; 50(3):173-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00013-7. View

2.
Riesenhuber M, Poggio T . Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(11):1019-25. DOI: 10.1038/14819. View

3.
Blanz V, Tarr M, Bulthoff H . What object attributes determine canonical views?. Perception. 2000; 28(5):575-99. DOI: 10.1068/p2897. View

4.
Freire A, Lee K, Symons L . The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception. 2000; 29(2):159-70. DOI: 10.1068/p3012. View

5.
Levay S, Hubel D, Wiesel T . The pattern of ocular dominance columns in macaque visual cortex revealed by a reduced silver stain. J Comp Neurol. 1975; 159(4):559-76. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901590408. View