» Articles » PMID: 27097600

Dual-robot Ultrasound-guided Needle Placement: Closing the Planning-imaging-action Loop

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Apr 22
PMID 27097600
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Precise needle placement is an important task during several medical procedures. Ultrasound imaging is often used to guide the needle toward the target region in soft tissue. This task remains challenging due to the user's dependence on image quality, limited field of view, moving target, and moving needle. In this paper, we present a novel dual-robot framework for robotic needle insertions under robotic ultrasound guidance.

Method: We integrated force-controlled ultrasound image acquisition, registration of preoperative and intraoperative images, vision-based robot control, and target localization, in combination with a novel needle tracking algorithm. The framework allows robotic needle insertion to target a preoperatively defined region of interest while enabling real-time visualization and adaptive trajectory planning to provide safe and quick interactions. We assessed the framework by considering both static and moving targets embedded in water and tissue-mimicking gelatin.

Results: The presented dual-robot tracking algorithms allow for accurate needle placement, namely to target the region of interest with an error around 1 mm.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, we show the first use of two independent robots, one for imaging, the other for needle insertion, that are simultaneously controlled using image processing algorithms. Experimental results show the feasibility and demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the process.

Citing Articles

Towards autonomous robotic THz-based in vivo skin sensing: the PicoBot.

Dogra A, Jones D, Hernandez Serrano A, Chakraborty S, Young J, Page B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4568.

PMID: 39915605 PMC: 11803113. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88718-6.


Respiration-Induced Organ Motion Compensation: A Review.

Wilcox S, Huang Z, Shah J, Yang X, Chen Y Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(2):271-283.

PMID: 39384667 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03630-w.


Review of robotic systems for thoracoabdominal puncture interventional surgery.

Wang C, Guo L, Zhu J, Zhu L, Li C, Zhu H APL Bioeng. 2024; 8(2):021501.

PMID: 38572313 PMC: 10987197. DOI: 10.1063/5.0180494.


Clinical application of a 5G-based telerobotic ultrasound system for thyroid examination on a rural island: a prospective study.

Zhang Y, Yin H, He T, Guo L, Zhao C, Xu H Endocrine. 2022; 76(3):620-634.

PMID: 35182363 PMC: 8857403. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03011-0.


Design of an end-effector for robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsies.

Welleweerd M, Siepel F, Groenhuis V, Veltman J, Stramigioli S Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020; 15(4):681-690.

PMID: 32100177 PMC: 7142059. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02122-1.


References
1.
Niccolini M, Castelli V, Diversi C, Kang B, Mussa F, Sinibaldi E . Development and preliminary assessment of a robotic platform for neuroendoscopy based on a lightweight robot. Int J Med Robot. 2015; 12(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1638. View

2.
Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G . PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014; 61(10):2527-37. PMC: 4437531. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2322864. View

3.
Yilmaz S, Ozdogan M, Cevener M, Ozluk A, Kargi A, Kendiroglu F . Use of cryoablation beyond the prostate. Insights Imaging. 2016; 7(2):223-32. PMC: 4805614. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-015-0460-7. View

4.
Abolhassani N, Patel R, Moallem M . Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey. Med Eng Phys. 2006; 29(4):413-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.07.003. View

5.
Hong J, Dohi T, Hashizume M, Konishi K, Hata N . An ultrasound-driven needle-insertion robot for percutaneous cholecystostomy. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49(3):441-55. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/3/007. View