» Articles » PMID: 27068898

Anticoccidial Effect of Mananoligosacharide Against Experimentally Induced Coccidiosis in Broiler

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Apr 13
PMID 27068898
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to find the effect of mananoligosacharide (MOS) in comparison with amprolium hydrochloride on performance and integrity of gut in experimentally induced coccidiosis in broiler. A total of 300, day-old male broiler chickens (Ross 308) was randomly allocated to four treatments. Each group was further divided into five replicates of 15 birds each. Group A was kept as control; group B was contaminated with Eimeria tenella, while groups C and D were infected with E. tenella and treated with MOS (0.8 g/kg feed) and anticoccidial drug, amprolium hydrochloride (12 g/100 l water), respectively. The results showed that weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in infected + MOS-treated group compared to the other groups. The result of oocyte per gram (OPG) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the group infected with coccidiosis during 5th, 7th, 10th, and 12th day post infection (dpi). Furthermore, the OPG was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in infected groups treated with MOS and amprolium at the studied periods (5, 7, and 10 dpi). At 12 dpi, the infected group treated with MOS showed significantly lower OPG compared to the other groups suggesting the effectiveness of MOS in comparison to amprolium. The result of pinpoint hemorrhages, thickness of cecal wall, bloody fecal contents, and mucoid contents in the cecum were significant highly (P < 0.05) in birds fed with infected oocytes. It was also noted that the differences were not significant in these parameters between amprolium and MOS-treated birds showing the effectiveness of the prebiotic agent. It was concluded from the results of the present study that MOS improved growth performance and reversed the lesions of E. tenella.

Citing Articles

Effect of dietary supplementation of Lawsonia inermis and Acacia nilotica extract on growth performance, intestinal histopathology, and antioxidant status of broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis.

Eldeeb F, Noseer E, Abdelazeem S, Ali E, Basher A, Abdalla M BMC Vet Res. 2025; 21(1):2.

PMID: 39762829 PMC: 11702094. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04409-w.


First microscopic, pathological, epidemiological, and molecular investigation of (Apicomplexa: ) parasites in Egyptian pigeons.

Elshahawy I, Mohammed E, Mawas A, Shibat El Hamd D, Ali E, Alghamdi A Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1434627.

PMID: 39170633 PMC: 11335660. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1434627.


Coccidiosis in Egg-Laying Hens and Potential Nutritional Strategies to Modulate Performance, Gut Health, and Immune Response.

Sharma M, Kim W Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612254 PMC: 11010854. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071015.


Anticoccidial effects of tannin-based herbal formulation (, , and ) against coccidiosis in broilers.

Ghafouri S, Ghaniei A, Sadr S, Amiri A, Tavanaee Tamannaei A, Charbgoo A J Parasit Dis. 2023; 47(4):820-828.

PMID: 38009158 PMC: 10667194. DOI: 10.1007/s12639-023-01627-1.


Dietary Oyster Mushroom () Waste Inhibits Experimentally Induced Challenge in Japanese Quails Model.

Nasir J, Chand N, Naz S, A Alhidary I, Khan R, Batool S Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958176 PMC: 10650477. DOI: 10.3390/ani13213421.


References
1.
Allen P, Fetterer R . Recent advances in biology and immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis and control of infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15(1):58-65. PMC: 118059. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.58-65.2002. View

2.
Gibson G, Roberfroid M . Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. 1995; 125(6):1401-12. DOI: 10.1093/jn/125.6.1401. View

3.
Grizard D, Barthomeuf C . Non-digestible oligosaccharides used as prebiotic agents: mode of production and beneficial effects on animal and human health. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2000; 39(5-6):563-88. DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19990505. View

4.
Bezkorovainy A . Probiotics: determinants of survival and growth in the gut. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73(2 Suppl):399S-405S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.399s. View

5.
Gibson G, Fuller R . Aspects of in vitro and in vivo research approaches directed toward identifying probiotics and prebiotics for human use. J Nutr. 2000; 130(2S Suppl):391S-395S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/130.2.391S. View