» Articles » PMID: 27068328

Host Choice in a Bivoltine Bee: How Sensory Constraints Shape Innate Foraging Behaviors

Overview
Journal BMC Ecol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Apr 13
PMID 27068328
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many insects have multiple generations per year and cohorts emerging in different seasons may evolve their own phenotypes if they are subjected to different selection regimes. The bivoltine bee Andrena bicolor is reported to be polylectic and oligolectic (on Campanula) in the spring and summer generations, respectively. Neurological constraints are assumed to govern pollen diet in bees. However, evidence comes predominantly from studies with oligolectic bees. We have investigated how sensory constraints influence the innate foraging behavior of A. bicolor and have tested whether bees of different generations evolved behavioral and sensory polyphenism to cope better with the host flowers available in nature when they are active.

Results: Behavioral and sensory polyphenisms were tested in choice assays and electroantennographic analyses, respectively. In the bioassays, we found that females of both generations (1) displayed a similar innate relative reliance on visual and olfactory floral cues irrespective of the host plants tested; (2) did not prefer floral cues of Campanula to those of Taraxacum (or vice versa) and (3) did not display an innate preference for yellow and lilac colors. In the electroantennographic analyses, we found that bees of both generations responded to the same set of compounds.

Conclusion: Overall, we did not detect seasonal polyphenism in any trait examined. The finding that bees of both generations are not sensory constrained to visit a specific host flower, which is in strict contrast to results from studies with oligolectic bees, suggest that also bees of the second generation have a flexibility in innate foraging behavior and that this is an adaptive trait in A. bicolor. We discuss the significance of our findings in context of the natural history of A. bicolor and in the broader context of host-range evolution in bees.

Citing Articles

Feeding specialization and longer generation time are associated with relatively larger brains in bees.

Sayol F, Collado M, Garcia-Porta J, Seid M, Gibbs J, Agorreta A Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1935):20200762.

PMID: 32933447 PMC: 7542820. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0762.


Flower Visitors of Campanula: Are Oligoleges More Sensitive to Host-Specific Floral Scents Than Polyleges?.

Brandt K, Dotterl S, Francke W, Ayasse M, Milet-Pinheiro P J Chem Ecol. 2016; 43(1):4-12.

PMID: 28032267 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0802-z.


Total Bee Dependence on One Flower Species Despite Available Congeners of Similar Floral Shape.

Gonzalez-Varo J, Ortiz-Sanchez F, Vila M PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0163122.

PMID: 27658205 PMC: 5033463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163122.

References
1.
Milet-Pinheiro P, Ayasse M, Dotterl S . Visual and Olfactory Floral Cues of Campanula (Campanulaceae) and Their Significance for Host Recognition by an Oligolectic Bee Pollinator. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0128577. PMC: 4465695. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128577. View

2.
Williams N . Use of novel pollen species by specialist and generalist solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Oecologia. 2003; 134(2):228-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1104-4. View

3.
Nylin S, Gotthard K . Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998; 43:63-83. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63. View

4.
Schaffler I, Steiner K, Haid M, van Berkel S, Gerlach G, Johnson S . Diacetin, a reliable cue and private communication channel in a specialized pollination system. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:12779. PMC: 4526864. DOI: 10.1038/srep12779. View

5.
Danforth B, Sipes S, Fang J, Brady S . The history of early bee diversification based on five genes plus morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(41):15118-23. PMC: 1586180. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604033103. View