» Articles » PMID: 24233444

The Chemical Basis of Host-plant Recognition in a Specialized Bee Pollinator

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Nov 16
PMID 24233444
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many pollinators specialize on a few plants as food sources and rely on flower scents to recognize their hosts. However, the specific compounds mediating this recognition are mostly unknown. We investigated the chemical basis of host location/recognition in the Campanula-specialist bee Chelostoma rapunculi using chemical, electrophysiological, and behavioral approaches. Our findings show that Ca. trachelium flowers emit a weak scent consisting of both widespread and rare (i.e., spiroacetals) volatiles. In electroantennographic analyses, the antennae of bees responded to aliphatics, terpenes, aromatics, and spiroacetals; however, the bioassays revealed a more complex response picture. Spiroacetals attracted host-naive bees, whereas spiroacetals together with aliphatics and terpenes were used for host finding by host-experienced bees. On the intrafloral level, different flower parts of Ca. trachelium showed differences in the absolute and relative amounts of scent, including spiroacetals. Scent from pollen-presenting flower parts elicited more feeding responses in host-naive bees as compared to a scentless control, whereas host-experienced bees responded more to the nectar-presenting parts. Our study demonstrates the occurrence of learning (i.e., change in the bee's innate chemical search-image) after bees gain foraging experience on host flowers. We conclude that highly specific floral volatiles play a key role in host-flower recognition by this pollen-specialist bee, and discuss our findings into the broader context of host-recognition in oligolectic bees.

Citing Articles

Innate floral object identification in a solitary pollinator employs a combination of both visual and olfactory cues.

Mishra A, Jain A, Iyer P, Suryanarayanan A, Nordstrom K, Olsson S Naturwissenschaften. 2025; 112(2):18.

PMID: 39960519 PMC: 11832567. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-025-01965-5.


Elevational shifts in reproductive ecology indicate the climate response of a model chasmophyte, Rainer's bellflower (Campanula raineri).

Villa S, Magoga G, Montagna M, Pierce S Ann Bot. 2024; 135(1-2):181-198.

PMID: 39349404 PMC: 11805931. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcae164.


Fields of flowers with few strikes: how oligolectic bees manage their foraging behavior on Calibrachoa elegans (Solanaceae).

Vieira A, Pataca L, Oliveira R, Schlindwein C Naturwissenschaften. 2024; 111(3):26.

PMID: 38647655 DOI: 10.1007/s00114-024-01912-w.


Semiochemical based integrated livestock pest control.

Parmar D, Verma S, Sharma D, Singh E Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(2):49.

PMID: 38236343 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-03890-7.


Synthetic fertilizers alter floral biophysical cues and bumblebee foraging behavior.

Hunting E, England S, Koh K, Lawson D, Brun N, Robert D PNAS Nexus. 2023; 1(5):pgac230.

PMID: 36712354 PMC: 9802097. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac230.


References
1.
Dotterl S, Wolfe L, Jurgens A . Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia. Phytochemistry. 2005; 66(2):203-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.12.002. View

2.
Burger H, Dotterl S, Haberlein C, Schulz S, Ayasse M . An arthropod deterrent attracts specialised bees to their host plants. Oecologia. 2011; 168(3):727-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2136-4. View

3.
Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, Schroder F, Kohnle U, Baader E . Semiochemicals from bark beetles: New results, remarks, and reflections. J Chem Ecol. 2013; 21(7):1043-63. DOI: 10.1007/BF02033807. View

4.
Schiestl F, Ayasse M . Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success?. Oecologia. 2017; 126(4):531-534. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000552. View

5.
Chittka L, Raine N . Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9(4):428-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.002. View