» Articles » PMID: 27047963

Effect of Extracellular Matrix Membrane on Bone Formation in a Rabbit Tibial Defect Model

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Apr 6
PMID 27047963
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Absorbable extracellular matrix (ECM) membrane has recently been used as a barrier membrane (BM) in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Absorbable BMs are mostly based on collagen, which is more biocompatible than synthetic materials. However, implanted absorbable BMs can be rapidly degraded by enzymes in vivo. In a previous study, to delay degradation time, collagen fibers were treated with cross-linking agents. These compounds prevented the enzymatic degradation of BMs. However, cross-linked BMs can exhibit delayed tissue integration. In addition, the remaining cross-linker could induce inflammation. Here, we attempted to overcome these problems using a natural ECM membrane. The membrane consisted of freshly harvested porcine pericardium that was stripped from cells and immunoreagents by a cleaning process. Acellular porcine pericardium (APP) showed a bilayer structure with a smooth upper surface and a significantly coarser bottom layer. APP is an ECM with a thin layer (0.18-0.35 mm) but with excellent mechanical properties. Tensile strength of APP was 14.15 ± 2.24 MPa. In in vivo experiments, APP was transplanted into rabbit tibia. The biocompatible material was retained for up to 3 months without the need for cross-linking. Therefore, we conclude that APP could support osteogenesis as a BM for up to 3 months.

Citing Articles

Zinc nanoparticles induced eggshell collagen membrane used for guided bone regeneration: A novel approach in rabbit models.

Nelogi S, Puranik N, Chindak S, Chowdhary R, Naik V Odontology. 2024; .

PMID: 39668278 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-01040-x.


Enhancing bone formation using absorbable AZ31B magnesium alloy membranes during distraction osteogenesis: A new material study.

Zhao G, Wang S, Wang G, Zhang B, Huang H, Yao Y Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e18032.

PMID: 37534007 PMC: 10391921. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18032.


Evaluation of Collagen Membranes Coated with Testosterone and Alendronate to Improve Guided Bone Regeneration in Mandibular Bone Defects in Minipigs.

van Oirschot B, Jansen J, van de Ven C, Geven E, Gossen J J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2020; 11(3):e4.

PMID: 33262883 PMC: 7644271. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2020.11304.


Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Barrier Membrane: An Experimental Study in Dogs.

Wang S, Wu W, Liu Y, Wang X, Tang L, You P Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:8962730.

PMID: 31828142 PMC: 6885186. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8962730.


[Research progress on the modification of guided bone regeneration membranes].

Cao Y, Liu C, Pan W, Tu Y, Li C, Hua C Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 37(3):325-329.

PMID: 31218871 PMC: 7030093. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.03.019.


References
1.
Fujihara K, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S . Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(19):4139-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014. View

2.
Freytes D, Martin J, Velankar S, Lee A, Badylak S . Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(11):1630-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.014. View

3.
Dong J, Li Y, Mo X . The study of a new detergent (octyl-glucopyranoside) for decellularizing porcine pericardium as tissue engineering scaffold. J Surg Res. 2012; 183(1):56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.047. View

4.
Mendoza-Novelo B, Avila E, Cauich-Rodriguez J, Jorge-Herrero E, Rojo F, Guinea G . Decellularization of pericardial tissue and its impact on tensile viscoelasticity and glycosaminoglycan content. Acta Biomater. 2010; 7(3):1241-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.017. View

5.
Abraham G, Murray J, Billiar K, Sullivan S . Evaluation of the porcine intestinal collagen layer as a biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 51(3):442-52. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<442::aid-jbm19>3.0.co;2-4. View