Sex Differences in the Functional Connectivity of the Amygdalae in Association with Cortisol

Overview

Journal Neuroimage

Specialty Radiology

Date 2016 Apr 5

PMID 27039701

Citations 43

Authors

Lydia Kogler

Veronika I Muller

Eva-Maria Seidel

Roland Boubela

Klaudius Kalcher

Ewald Moser

Ute Habel

Ruben C Gur

Simon B Eickhoff

Birgit Derntl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human amygdalae are involved in various behavioral functions such as affective and stress processing. For these behavioral functions, as well as for psychophysiological arousal including cortisol release, sex differences are reported. Here, we assessed cortisol levels and resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of left and right amygdalae in 81 healthy participants (42 women) to investigate potential modulation of amygdala rsFC by sex and cortisol concentration. Our analyses revealed that rsFC of the left amygdala significantly differed between women and men: Women showed stronger rsFC than men between the left amygdala and left middle temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, postcentral gyrus and hippocampus, regions involved in face processing, inner-speech, fear and pain processing. No stronger connections were detected for men and no sex difference emerged for right amygdala rsFC. Also, an interaction of sex and cortisol appeared: In women, cortisol was negatively associated with rsFC of the amygdalae with striatal regions, mid-orbital frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus, middle and superior frontal gyri, supplementary motor area and the parietal-occipital sulcus. Contrarily in men, positive associations of cortisol with rsFC of the left amygdala and these structures were observed. Functional decoding analyses revealed an association of the amygdalae and these regions with emotion, reward and memory processing, as well as action execution. Our results suggest that functional connectivity of the amygdalae as well as the regulatory effect of cortisol on brain networks differs between women and men. These sex-differences and the mediating and sex-dependent effect of cortisol on brain communication systems should be taken into account in affective and stress-related neuroimaging research. Thus, more studies including both sexes are required.

Citing Articles

Electroconvulsive therapy-specific volume changes in nuclei of the amygdala and their relationship to long-term anxiety improvement in depression.

Ishikawa Y, Oishi N, Kyuragi Y, Hatakoshi M, Hirano J, Noda T Mol Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39681629 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02874-1.

Odor awareness modulates the association between perceived stress and chemosensory anhedonia in women.

Hu Q, Tuluhong M, Han P Psych J. 2024; 13(5):870-879.

PMID: 38757253 PMC: 11444723. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.769.

Sex classification from functional brain connectivity: Generalization to multiple datasets.

Wiersch L, Friedrich P, Hamdan S, Komeyer V, Hoffstaedter F, Patil K Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(6):e26683.

PMID: 38647035 PMC: 11034006. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26683.

Targeting Human Glucocorticoid Receptors in Fear Learning: A Multiscale Integrated Approach to Study Functional Connectivity.

Battaglia S, Di Fazio C, Mazza M, Tamietto M, Avenanti A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38255937 PMC: 10815285. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020864.

Sex differences in the effects of trait anxiety and age on resting-state functional connectivities of the amygdala.

Chaudhary S, Hu S, Hu K, Dominguez J, Chao H, Li C J Affect Disord Rep. 2023; 14.

PMID: 38105798 PMC: 10723810. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100646.

References

Muller V, Langner R, Cieslik E, Rottschy C, Eickhoff S . Interindividual differences in cognitive flexibility: influence of gray matter volume, functional connectivity and trait impulsivity. Brain Struct Funct. 2014; 220(4):2401-14. PMC: 4981636. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0797-6. View

Roy A, Shehzad Z, Margulies D, Kelly A, Uddin L, Gotimer K . Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2008; 45(2):614-26. PMC: 2735022. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.030. View

Bluhm R, Williamson P, Osuch E, Frewen P, Stevens T, Boksman K . Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009; 34(3):187-94. PMC: 2674971. View

Lopez-Larson M, Anderson J, Ferguson M, Yurgelun-Todd D . Local brain connectivity and associations with gender and age. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 1(2):187-97. PMC: 3079272. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.10.001. View

Eickhoff S, Schleicher A, Zilles K, Amunts K . The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 16(2):254-67. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi105. View

Henckens M, van Wingen G, Joels M, Fernandez G . Time-dependent effects of cortisol on selective attention and emotional interference: a functional MRI study. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012; 6:66. PMC: 3428804. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00066. View

Kajantie E, Phillips D . The effects of sex and hormonal status on the physiological response to acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005; 31(2):151-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.07.002. View

Stevens J, Hamann S . Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(7):1578-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011. View

Kirschbaum C, Kudielka B, Gaab J, Schommer N, Hellhammer D . Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosom Med. 1999; 61(2):154-62. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199903000-00006. View

10.

Weissenbacher A, Kasess C, Gerstl F, Lanzenberger R, Moser E, Windischberger C . Correlations and anticorrelations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI: a quantitative comparison of preprocessing strategies. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(4):1408-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.005. View

11.

Veer I, Oei N, Spinhoven P, van Buchem M, Elzinga B, Rombouts S . Beyond acute social stress: increased functional connectivity between amygdala and cortical midline structures. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(4):1534-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.074. View

12.

de Kloet E, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl M, Joels M . Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 1998; 19(3):269-301. DOI: 10.1210/edrv.19.3.0331. View

13.

Evans G, Swain J, King A, Wang X, Javanbakht A, Shaun Ho S . Childhood Cumulative Risk Exposure and Adult Amygdala Volume and Function. J Neurosci Res. 2015; 94(6):535-43. PMC: 4833698. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23681. View

14.

Friston K, Frith C, Liddle P, Frackowiak R . Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993; 13(1):5-14. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.4. View

15.

Murphy K, Birn R, Handwerker D, Jones T, Bandettini P . The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced?. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):893-905. PMC: 2750906. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036. View

16.

Ulrich-Lai Y, Herman J . Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(6):397-409. PMC: 4240627. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2647. View

17.

Jabbi M, Swart M, Keysers C . Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. Neuroimage. 2006; 34(4):1744-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.032. View

18.

Mason M, Norton M, Van Horn J, Wegner D, Grafton S, Neil Macrae C . Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science. 2007; 315(5810):393-5. PMC: 1821121. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131295. View

19.

Alarcon G, Cservenka A, Rudolph M, Fair D, Nagel B . Developmental sex differences in resting state functional connectivity of amygdala sub-regions. Neuroimage. 2015; 115:235-44. PMC: 4461484. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.013. View

20.

Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich M, Smith S, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Boulby P . Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(7):750-7. DOI: 10.1038/nn1075. View