Characterization and Correction of Geometric Distortions in 814 Diffusion Weighted Images

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2016 Mar 31

PMID 27027775

Citations 56

Authors

Jeffrey Mark Treiber

Nathan S White

Tyler Christian Steed

Hauke Bartsch

Dominic Holland

Nikdokht Farid

Carrie R McDonald

Bob S Carter

Anders Martin Dale

Clark C Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), which is based on Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) protocols, is becoming increasingly important for neurosurgical applications. However, its use in this context is limited in part by significant spatial distortion inherent to EPI.

Method: We evaluated an efficient algorithm for EPI distortion correction (EPIC) across 814 DWI scans from 250 brain tumor patients and quantified the magnitude of geometric distortion for whole brain and multiple brain regions.

Results: Evaluation of the algorithm's performance revealed significantly higher mutual information between T1-weighted pre-contrast images and corrected b = 0 images than the uncorrected b = 0 images (p < 0.001). The distortion magnitude across all voxels revealed a median EPI distortion effect of 2.1 mm, ranging from 1.2 mm to 5.9 mm, the 5th and 95th percentile, respectively. Regions adjacent to bone-air interfaces, such as the orbitofrontal cortex, temporal poles, and brain stem, were the regions most severely affected by DWI distortion.

Conclusion: Using EPIC to estimate the degree of distortion in 814 DWI brain tumor images enabled the creation of a topographic atlas of DWI distortion across the brain. The degree of displacement of tumors boundaries in uncorrected images is severe but can be corrected for using EPIC. Our results support the use of distortion correction to ensure accurate and careful application of DWI to neurosurgical practice.

Citing Articles

Linguistic coupling between neural systems for speech production and comprehension during real-time dyadic conversations.

Zada Z, Nastase S, Speer S, Mwilambwe-Tshilobo L, Tsoi L, Burns S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990465 PMC: 11844503. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.14.638276.

Longitudinal assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging during magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Boeke S, Habrich J, Kubler S, Boldt J, Schick F, Nikolaou K Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):15.

PMID: 39881423 PMC: 11780986. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02589-9.

Multi-study fMRI outlooks on subcortical BOLD responses in the stop-signal paradigm.

Isherwood S, Kemp S, Miletic S, Stevenson N, Bazin P, Forstmann B Elife. 2025; 12.

PMID: 39841120 PMC: 11753779. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88652.

Prediction of pathological response and lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer through tumor and mesorectal MRI radiomic features.

Qin S, Liu K, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Zhao W, Yan R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21927.

PMID: 39304726 PMC: 11415499. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72916-9.

Task-based functional neural correlates of social cognition across autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Oliver L, Moxon-Emre I, Hawco C, Dickie E, Dakli A, Lyon R Mol Autism. 2024; 15(1):37.

PMID: 39252047 PMC: 11385649. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-024-00615-3.

References

Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P . Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal. 2000; 3(4):373-86. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(99)80030-9. View

Rakow-Penner R, White N, Margolis D, Parsons J, Schenker-Ahmed N, Kuperman J . Prostate diffusion imaging with distortion correction. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 33(9):1178-1181. PMC: 4594204. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.07.006. View

Hutton C, Bork A, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Ashburner J, Turner R . Image distortion correction in fMRI: A quantitative evaluation. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(1):217-40. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1054. View

Andersson J, Skare S, Ashburner J . How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003; 20(2):870-88. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7. View

Morgan P, Bowtell R, McIntyre D, Worthington B . Correction of spatial distortion in EPI due to inhomogeneous static magnetic fields using the reversed gradient method. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 19(4):499-507. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20032. View

Turner R, Le Bihan D, Chesnick A . Echo-planar imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Magn Reson Med. 1991; 19(2):247-53. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910190210. View

Jezzard P, Balaban R . Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 34(1):65-73. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910340111. View

Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P . Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16(2):187-98. DOI: 10.1109/42.563664. View

Chen N, Wyrwicz A . Correction for EPI distortions using multi-echo gradient-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 41(6):1206-13. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1206::aid-mrm17>3.0.co;2-l. View

10.

Doran S, Charles-Edwards L, Reinsberg S, Leach M . A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(7):1343-61. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/7/001. View

11.

Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, Haley E, van der Kouwe A, Gollub R . Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage. 2005; 30(2):436-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.046. View

12.

Price S, Jena R, Burnet N, Hutchinson P, Dean A, Pena A . Improved delineation of glioma margins and regions of infiltration with the use of diffusion tensor imaging: an image-guided biopsy study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(9):1969-74. PMC: 7977915. View

13.

Zhuang J, Hrabe J, Kangarlu A, Xu D, Bansal R, Branch C . Correction of eddy-current distortions in diffusion tensor images using the known directions and strengths of diffusion gradients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(5):1188-93. PMC: 2364728. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20727. View

14.

Funai A, Fessler J, Yeo D, Olafsson V, Noll D . Regularized field map estimation in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27(10):1484-94. PMC: 2856353. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.923956. View

15.

Holland D, Kuperman J, Dale A . Efficient correction of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion in Echo Planar Imaging. Neuroimage. 2009; 50(1):175-83. PMC: 2819607. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.044. View

16.

Gholipour A, Kehtarnavaz N, Scherrer B, Warfield S . On the accuracy of unwarping techniques for the correction of susceptibility-induced geometric distortion in magnetic resonance Echo-planar images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2011:6997-7000. PMC: 3675776. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091769. View

17.

Zhao Y, Chen X, Wang F, Sun G, Wang Y, Song Z . Integration of diffusion tensor-based arcuate fasciculus fibre navigation and intraoperative MRI into glioma surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2012; 19(2):255-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.03.041. View

18.

Irfanoglu M, Walker L, Sarlls J, Marenco S, Pierpaoli C . Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(1):275-88. PMC: 3653420. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.054. View

19.

Jezzard P . Correction of geometric distortion in fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2011; 62(2):648-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.010. View

20.

Ellingson B, Lai A, Harris R, Selfridge J, Yong W, Das K . Probabilistic radiographic atlas of glioblastoma phenotypes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 34(3):533-40. PMC: 7964888. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3253. View