» Articles » PMID: 27008105

The Value of Thyroid Shielding in Intraoral Radiography

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 24
PMID 27008105
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of the application of a thyroid shield in intraoral radiography when using rectangular collimation.

Methods: Experimental data were obtained by measuring the absorbed dose at the position of the thyroid gland in a RANDO(®) (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) male phantom with a dosemeter. Four protocols were tested: round collimation and rectangular collimation, both with and without thyroid shield. Five exposure positions were deployed: upper incisor (Isup), upper canine (Csup), upper premolar (Psup), upper molar (Msup) and posterior bitewing (BW). Exposures were made with 70 kV and 7 mA and were repeated 10 times. The exposure times were as recommended for the exposure positions for the respective collimator type by the manufacturer for digital imaging. The data were statistically analyzed with a three-way ANOVA test. Significance was set at p < 0.01.

Results: The ANOVA test revealed that the differences between mean doses of all protocols and geometries were statistically significant, p < 0.001. For the Isup, thyroid dose levels were comparable with both collimators at a level indicating primary beam exposure. Thyroid shield reduced this dose with circa 75%. For the Csup position, round collimation also revealed primary beam exposure, and thyroid shield yield was 70%. In Csup with rectangular collimation, the thyroid dose was reduced with a factor 4 compared with round collimation and thyroid shield yielded an additional 42% dose reduction. The thyroid dose levels for the Csup, Psup, Msup and BW exposures were lower with rectangular collimation without thyroid shield than with round collimation with thyroid shield. With rectangular collimation, the thyroid shield in Psup, Msup and BW reduced the dose 10% or less, where dose levels were already low, implying no clinical significance.

Conclusions: For the exposures in the upper anterior region, thyroid shield results in an important dose reduction for the thyroid. For the other exposures, thyroid shield augments little to the reduction achieved by rectangular collimation. The use of thyroid shield is to be advised, when performing upper anterior radiography.

Citing Articles

A Prospective Study of a Custom-Made Eco-Friendly Thyroid Shield: A Breakthrough in Radiation Protection.

Sirisha M, Takkella B, Ambadipudi J, Rai N, Vadlamani R, Jayanth V Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75762.

PMID: 39816275 PMC: 11732960. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75762.


Exposure and protection protocols of dentomaxillofacial imaging applied by paediatric dentists in Europe.

Mitsea A, Seremidi K, Christoloukas N, Gizani S Oral Radiol. 2024; 40(2):188-198.

PMID: 38191969 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00720-8.


Study of Prepared Lead-Free Polymer Nanocomposites for X- and Gamma-ray Shielding in Healthcare Applications.

Alsaab A, Zeghib S Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37177287 PMC: 10181160. DOI: 10.3390/polym15092142.


Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about radiation safety among the undergraduates in Eastern province dental college.

Mahabob M, Alabdulsalam M, Alabduladhem A, Alfayz S, Alzuriq A, Almomin A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 13(Suppl 2):S1442-S1447.

PMID: 35018006 PMC: 8686986. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_248_21.


A Letter Regarding Recently Published Original Article: Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An Study.

Aps J Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021; 13(5):576-577.

PMID: 33623351 PMC: 7887161. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1845.


References
1.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

2.
Hoogeveen R, Sanderink G, van der Stelt P, Berkhout W . Reducing an already low dental diagnostic X-ray dose: does it make sense? Comparison of three cost-utility analysis methods used to assess two dental dose-reduction measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44(9):20150158. PMC: 5083903. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150158. View

3.
Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G . Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34(3):145-9. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28107460. View

4.
. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1991; 21(1-3):1-201. View

5.
Kaffe I, Littner M, Shlezinger T, Segal P . Efficiency of the cervical lead shield during intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62(6):732-6. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90272-0. View