» Articles » PMID: 26996412

Prion-like Domains As Epigenetic Regulators, Scaffolds for Subcellular Organization, and Drivers of Neurodegenerative Disease

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Mar 22
PMID 26996412
Citations 139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Key challenges faced by all cells include how to spatiotemporally organize complex biochemistry and how to respond to environmental fluctuations. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae harnesses alternative protein folding mediated by yeast prion domains (PrDs) for rapid evolution of new traits in response to environmental stress. Increasingly, it is appreciated that low complexity domains similar in amino acid composition to yeast PrDs (prion-like domains; PrLDs) found in metazoa have a prominent role in subcellular cytoplasmic organization, especially in relation to RNA homeostasis. In this review, we highlight recent advances in our understanding of the role of prions in enabling rapid adaptation to environmental stress in yeast. We also present the complete list of human proteins with PrLDs and discuss the prevalence of the PrLD in nucleic-acid binding proteins that are often connected to neurodegenerative disease, including: ataxin 1, ataxin 2, FUS, TDP-43, TAF15, EWSR1, hnRNPA1, and hnRNPA2. Recent paradigm-shifting advances establish that PrLDs undergo phase transitions to liquid states, which contribute to the structure and biophysics of diverse membraneless organelles. This structural functionality of PrLDs, however, simultaneously increases their propensity for deleterious protein-misfolding events that drive neurodegenerative disease. We suggest that even these PrLD-misfolding events are not irreversible and can be mitigated by natural or engineered protein disaggregases, which could have important therapeutic applications. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:RNA Metabolism in Disease.

Citing Articles

Prion-like Properties of Short Isoforms of Human Chromatin Modifier PHC3.

Kachkin D, Zelinsky A, Romanova N, Kulichikhin K, Zykin P, Khorolskaya J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003978 PMC: 11855497. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041512.


Direct ionic stress sensing and mitigation by the transcription factor NFAT5.

Khandwala C, Sarkar P, Schmidt H, Ma M, Pusapati G, Lamoliatte F Sci Adv. 2025; 11(8):eadu3194.

PMID: 39970224 PMC: 11838016. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adu3194.


Opposing roles of p38α-mediated phosphorylation and PRMT1-mediated arginine methylation in driving TDP-43 proteinopathy.

Aikio M, Odeh H, Wobst H, Lee B, Chan U, Mauna J Cell Rep. 2025; 44(1):115205.

PMID: 39817908 PMC: 11831926. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115205.


Emerging regulatory mechanisms and functions of biomolecular condensates: implications for therapeutic targets.

Jeon S, Jeon Y, Lim J, Kim Y, Cha B, Kim W Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):4.

PMID: 39757214 PMC: 11701242. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02070-1.


Design principles to tailor Hsp104 therapeutics.

Lin J, Carman P, Gambogi C, Kendsersky N, Chuang E, Gates S Cell Rep. 2024; 43(12):115005.

PMID: 39671291 PMC: 11815640. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115005.


References
1.
Polymenidou M, Cleveland D . Prion-like spread of protein aggregates in neurodegeneration. J Exp Med. 2012; 209(5):889-93. PMC: 3348110. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20120741. View

2.
King C, Diaz-Avalos R . Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature. 2004; 428(6980):319-23. DOI: 10.1038/nature02391. View

3.
Weber S, Brangwynne C . Getting RNA and protein in phase. Cell. 2012; 149(6):1188-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.022. View

4.
Murakami T, Qamar S, Lin J, Kaminski Schierle G, Rees E, Miyashita A . ALS/FTD Mutation-Induced Phase Transition of FUS Liquid Droplets and Reversible Hydrogels into Irreversible Hydrogels Impairs RNP Granule Function. Neuron. 2015; 88(4):678-90. PMC: 4660210. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.030. View

5.
Osherovich L, Weissman J . Multiple Gln/Asn-rich prion domains confer susceptibility to induction of the yeast [PSI(+)] prion. Cell. 2001; 106(2):183-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00440-8. View