» Articles » PMID: 26968739

Influence of Target Parameters on Fixation Stability in Normal and Strabismic Monkeys

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Mar 13
PMID 26968739
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of fixation target parameters on fixation instability in strabismic monkeys.

Methods: One normal and three exotropic monkeys were presented with four differently shaped fixation targets, with three diameters, during monocular or binocular viewing. Fixation targets were white on a black background or vice versa. Binocular eye movements were recorded using the magnetic search coil technique and fixation stability quantified by calculating the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA).

Results: Fixation instability was greater in all the strabismic monkeys compared with the normal monkey. During monocular viewing, strabismic monkeys showed significantly greater instability in the covered eye compared to the fixating eye. Multifactorial ANOVA suggested statistically significant target parameter influences, although effect sizes were small. Thus, a disk-shaped target resulted in greater instability than other target shapes in the viewing eyes of the normal monkey and two of three strabismic monkeys. A similar target-shape effect was also observed in the covered eye. Least instability was elicited with a 0.5° target in the normal monkey and a 1.0° target in the strabismic monkeys, both in the viewing and the covered eye. Target/background polarity effects were idiosyncratic. In strabismic monkeys, stability of the fixating eye during binocular viewing was not different from the stability of the same eye during monocular viewing.

Conclusions: Abnormal drifts and nystagmus contribute to increased fixation instability in strabismic monkeys. Target parameters (shape and size) that influence fixation stability in a normal animal also affected fixation stability in our sample of strabismic monkeys.

Citing Articles

Assessing inter-ocular fixational eye movements throughout the lifespan.

Yue S, Cakir G, Shaikh A, Ghasia F Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(12):2749-2763.

PMID: 39395061 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06936-2.


Eye movement indices as predictors of conversion to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk.

Zhang D, Xu L, Xie Y, Tang X, Hu Y, Liu X Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022; 273(3):553-563.

PMID: 35857090 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01463-z.


The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Evidence from eye-tracking measures.

Zhang D, Guo Q, Xu L, Liu X, Zhang T, Liu X Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022; 118:110578.

PMID: 35618148 PMC: 9126616. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110578.


Quantitative Evaluation of the Association Between Fixation Stability and Phoria During Short-Term Binocular Viewing.

Kim S, Moon B, Cho H, Yu D Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:721665.

PMID: 35368249 PMC: 8965591. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.721665.


Effect of Viewing Conditions on Fixation Eye Movements and Eye Alignment in Amblyopia.

Murray J, Gupta P, Dulaney C, Garg K, Shaikh A, Ghasia F Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022; 63(2):33.

PMID: 35212720 PMC: 8883146. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.2.33.


References
1.
Boothe R, Dobson V, Teller D . Postnatal development of vision in human and nonhuman primates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1985; 8:495-545. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002431. View

2.
Levi D . Linking assumptions in amblyopia. Vis Neurosci. 2013; 30(5-6):277-87. PMC: 5533593. DOI: 10.1017/S0952523813000023. View

3.
Levi D, Klein S, Yap Y . Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vision Res. 1987; 27(4):581-97. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90044-7. View

4.
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik S, Troncoso X, Hubel D . Microsaccades: a neurophysiological analysis. Trends Neurosci. 2009; 32(9):463-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.006. View

5.
Gonzalez E, Tarita-Nistor L, Mandelcorn E, Mandelcorn M, Steinbach M . Fixation control before and after treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(7):4208-13. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-7026. View