» Articles » PMID: 12358319

New Developments in Supra-threshold Perimetry

Overview
Date 2002 Oct 3
PMID 12358319
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe a series of recent enhancements to supra-threshold perimetry.

Methods: Computer simulations were used to develop an improved algorithm (HEART) for the setting of the supra-threshold test intensity at the beginning of a field test, and to evaluate the relationship between various pass/fail criteria and the test's performance (sensitivity and specificity) and how they compare with modern threshold perimetry. Data were collected in optometric practices to evaluate HEART and to assess how the patient's response times can be analysed to detect false positive response errors in visual field test results.

Results: The HEART algorithm shows improved performance (reduced between-eye differences) over current algorithms. A pass/fail criterion of '3 stimuli seen of 3-5 presentations' at each test location reduces test/retest variability and combines high sensitivity and specificity. A large percentage of false positive responses can be detected by comparing their latencies to the average response time of a patient.

Conclusions: Optimised supra-threshold visual field tests can perform as well as modern threshold techniques. Such tests may be easier to perform for novice patients, compared with the more demanding threshold tests.

Citing Articles

Frequency-of-seeing curves (psychometric functions) for perimetric stimuli in age-related macular degeneration.

Denniss J, Baggaley H, Astle A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(1):301-307.

PMID: 39329222 PMC: 11629837. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13396.


Suprathreshold Approaches to Mapping the Visual Field in Advanced Glaucoma.

Denniss J, McKendrick A, Turpin A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023; 12(6):19.

PMID: 37358492 PMC: 10297785. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.6.19.


Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity.

Tachyla I, Battaglini L, Barollo M, Cosentino S, Contemori G, Pinello L PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221122.

PMID: 31408500 PMC: 6692005. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221122.


Normal Threshold Size of Stimuli in Children Using a Game-Based Visual Field Test.

Wang Y, Ali Z, Subramani S, Biswas S, Fenerty C, Henson D Ophthalmol Ther. 2016; 6(1):115-122.

PMID: 27885592 PMC: 5449290. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-016-0071-5.


Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter.

Grobbel J, Dietzsch J, Johnson C, Vonthein R, Stingl K, Weleber R Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5(2):5.

PMID: 26966641 PMC: 4782826. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.5.