» Articles » PMID: 26964993

To Characterize the Incidence of Airway Misplacement of Nasogastric Tubes in Anesthetized Intubated Patients by Using a Manometer Technique

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Mar 12
PMID 26964993
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study characterized the incidence of airway misplacement of nasogastric (NG) tubes in surgical patients, and the benefit of using a manometer to discriminate gastric placement from airway placement of NG tubes. Subjects included adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. After tracheal intubation, a 16 Fr. NG tube was inserted blindly through the nostril, and its position was assessed using the auscultation (10-ml air insufflation) or manometer (attached to NG tubes) techniques. Briefly, a biphasic pressure change synchronous with airway pressure during mechanical ventilation indicated airway misplacement. The presence of a notable pressure change while compressing the epigastric area indicated a gastric placement. A surgeon made the final confirmation of NG tube placement within the stomach using manual palpation of the tube immediately after laparotomy. The first-attempt success rate was 82.7 % in 104 patients. There were 29 misplacements of 130 attempted insertions (oral cavity, n = 23; trachea, n = 3; distal esophagus, n = 3). The incidence of airway misplacement was 2.9 % (3 of 104 cases). For confirmation of gastric placement, the auscultation technique had a sensitivity of 100.0 % and a specificity of 79.3 %. In contrast, the manometer technique had a sensitivity of 100.0 % and a specificity of 100.0 % in the discrimination of gastric placement from airway placement of NG tubes. Airway misplacement of NG tubes is not uncommon in surgical patients, and the manometer technique may be a reliable and safe method to discriminate gastric placement from airway placement of NG tubes.

Citing Articles

Performance of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Confirming Feeding Tube Placement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Ragunathan T, Teo R, Mohamad Yusof A, Mohamad Mahdi S, Izaham A, Liu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627936 PMC: 10453280. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162679.


Effectiveness of techniques for insertion of nasoenteral probe in critical patients: Randomized clinical trial.

Queiroz C, Dantas J, Araujo S, Rocha M, Mendes F, Medeiros K Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(20):e33795.

PMID: 37335732 PMC: 10194724. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033795.

References
1.
Taylor S, Allan K, McWilliam H, Toher D . Nasogastric tube depth: the 'NEX' guideline is incorrect. Br J Nurs. 2014; 23(12):641-4. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.12.641. View

2.
Chen Y, Wang L, Chang Y, Yang C, Wu T, Lin F . Potential risk of malposition of nasogastric tube using nose-ear-xiphoid measurement. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e88046. PMC: 3919749. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088046. View

3.
Brimacomb J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J . Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88(1):127-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.1.127. View

4.
Kawati R, Rubertsson S . Malpositioning of fine bore feeding tube: a serious complication. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49(1):58-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00508.x. View

5.
Ozer S, Benumof J . Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients: fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91(1):137-43. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00022. View