» Articles » PMID: 26964992

Utility of Stroke Volume Variation Measured Using Non-invasive Bioreactance As a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in the Prone Position

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Mar 12
PMID 26964992
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of stroke volume variation (SVV) derived from NICOM to predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position. Forty adult patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position were included in this study. We measured SVV from NICOM (SVV) and FloTrac™/Vigileo™ systems (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) using automatic (PPV) and manual (PPV) calculations at four time points including supine and prone positions, and before and after fluid loading of 6 ml kg colloid solution. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the cardiac index from Vigileo™ of ≥12 %. There were 19 responders and 21 non-responders. Prone positioning induced a significant decrease in SVV, SVV, PPV, and PPV. However, all of these parameters successfully predicted fluid responsiveness in the prone position with area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves for SVV, SVV, PPV, and PPV of 0.78 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.90, P = 0.0001], 0.79 (95 % CI 0.63-0.90, P = 0.0001), 0.76 (95 % CI 0.6-0.88, P = 0.0006), and 0.84 (95 % CI 0.69-0.94, P < 0.0001), respectively. The optimal cut-off values were 12 % for SVV, SVV, and PPV, and 10 % for PPV. SVV from NICOM successfully predicts fluid responsiveness during surgery in the prone position. This totally non-invasive technique for assessing individual functional intravenous volume status would be useful in a wide range of surgeries performed in the prone position.

Citing Articles

Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.

Messina A, Caporale M, Calabro L, Lionetti G, Bono D, Matronola G Crit Care. 2023; 27(1):431.

PMID: 37940953 PMC: 10631038. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04706-0.


Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Wu M, Dai Z, Liang Y, Liu X, Zheng X, Zhang W BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1):360.

PMID: 37932674 PMC: 10626766. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02313-8.


Effect of acute normovolemic hemodilution on anesthetic effect, plasma concentration, and recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Liu T, Bai Y, Yin L, Wang J, Yao N, You L BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):689.

PMID: 37875833 PMC: 10598930. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04397-w.


Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position.

Watanabe R, Suehiro K, Mukai A, Tanaka K, Yamada T, Mori T BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21(1):303.

PMID: 34856928 PMC: 8638171. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01527-y.


Bioreactance-Based Noninvasive Fluid Responsiveness and Cardiac Output Monitoring: A Pilot Study in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Literature Review.

Sivakumar S, Lazaridis C Crit Care Res Pract. 2020; 2020:2748181.

PMID: 33014461 PMC: 7512079. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2748181.


References
1.
Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul J, Artigas A, Talbot A, Sabatier C, Richard C . Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(6):961-6. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet282. View

2.
Frezza E, Mezghebe H . Indications and complications of arterial catheter use in surgical or medical intensive care units: analysis of 4932 patients. Am Surg. 1998; 64(2):127-31. View

3.
Biais M, Bernard O, Ha J, Degryse C, Sztark F . Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 104(4):407-13. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq031. View

4.
Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer C, Goarin J, Lehot J, Vallet B . Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115(2):231-41. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a. View

5.
Hojlund J, Sandmand M, Sonne M, Mantoni T, Jorgensen H, Belhage B . Effect of head rotation on cerebral blood velocity in the prone position. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012; 2012:647258. PMC: 3440850. DOI: 10.1155/2012/647258. View