» Articles » PMID: 26962078

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2016 Mar 11
PMID 26962078
Citations 161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When combined with ceftazidime, the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam provides a carbapenem alternative against multidrug-resistant infections. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole were compared with meropenem in 1066 men and women with complicated intra-abdominal infections from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (NCT01499290 and NCT01500239).

Methods: The primary end point was clinical cure at test-of-cure visit 28-35 days after randomization, assessed by noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population (in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance), and the modified intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations (European Medicines Agency guidance). Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-group difference was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12.5%.

Results: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem across all primary analysis populations. Clinical cure rates with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem, respectively, were as follows: mMITT population, 81.6% and 85.1% (between-group difference, -3.5%; 95% confidence interval -8.64 to 1.58); modified intention-to-treat, 82.5% and 84.9% (-2.4%; -6.90 to 2.10); and clinically evaluable, 91.7% and 92.5% (-0.8%; -4.61 to 2.89). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for ceftazidime-resistant infections was comparable to that with meropenem (mMITT population, 83.0% and 85.9%, respectively) and similar to the regimen's own efficacy against ceftazidime-susceptible infections (82.0%). Adverse events were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Efficacy was similar against infections caused by ceftazidime-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant pathogens. The safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was consistent with that previously observed with ceftazidime alone.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01499290 and NCT01500239.

Citing Articles

Difficult-to-Treat Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Comprehensive Review and Treatment Proposal.

Vidal-Cortes P, Campos-Fernandez S, Cuenca-Fito E, Del Rio-Carbajo L, Fernandez-Ugidos P, Lopez-Ciudad V Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001421 PMC: 11851922. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14020178.


Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khoshdel N, Noursalehigarakani M, Seghatoleslami Z, Hadavand F, Eghbal E, Nasiri M Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025; .

PMID: 39841366 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-025-05044-5.


Impact of renal-adjusted ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with KPC-producing bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Oliva A, Volpicelli L, Gigante A, Di Nillo M, Trapani S, Viscido A JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024; 6(6):dlae201.

PMID: 39691790 PMC: 11649808. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae201.


Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective, Single Center Study.

Yu C, Tsai M, Liao C, Yang C Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:5363-5374.

PMID: 39654695 PMC: 11626955. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S475679.


Multidrug Resistant in Clinical Settings: A Review of Resistance Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies.

Schwartz B, Klamer K, Zimmerman J, Kale-Pradhan P, Bhargava A Pathogens. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39599528 PMC: 11597786. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13110975.


References
1.
Welage L, Schultz R, Schentag J . Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in patients with renal insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 25(2):201-4. PMC: 185474. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.2.201. View

2.
Crandon J, Schuck V, Banevicius M, Beaudoin M, Nichols W, Tanudra M . Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(12):6137-46. PMC: 3497209. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00851-12. View

3.
Mohr 3rd J . Update on the efficacy and tolerability of meropenem in the treatment of serious bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47 Suppl 1:S41-51. DOI: 10.1086/590065. View

4.
Stachyra T, Pechereau M, Bruneau J, Claudon M, Frere J, Miossec C . Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(12):5132-8. PMC: 2981269. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00568-10. View

5.
Lucasti C, Popescu I, Ramesh M, Lipka J, Sable C . Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, Phase II trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68(5):1183-92. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks523. View