» Articles » PMID: 26949654

Comparison of Two Types of Visual Quality Analyzer for the Measurement of High Order Aberrations

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Mar 8
PMID 26949654
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations.

Methods: KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement.

Conclusion: KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

Bartol-Puyal F, Gimenez G, Mendez-Martinez S, Larrosa J, Polo V, Pablo L Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024; 38(2):168-172.

PMID: 38988783 PMC: 11232754. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23.


Higher order aberrations and visual function in a young Asian population of high myopes.

Chay I, Lin S, Lim E, Heng W, Ismail M, Tan M Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e14901.

PMID: 37151700 PMC: 10161382. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14901.


Comparison of anterior corneal aberrations measured by Scheimpflug and Placido Disc System for myopes.

Lou W, Du W, Jin H, Hu Y BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):512.

PMID: 36578031 PMC: 9798706. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02753-9.


Comparison of wavefront aberrations in the object and image spaces using wide-field individual eye models.

Liu Y, Li X, Zhang L, Yi X, Xing Y, Li K Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 13(9):4939-4953.

PMID: 36187261 PMC: 9484411. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.464781.


Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform.

A Bartol-Puyal F, Gimenez G, Altemir I, Larrosa J, Polo V, Pablo L Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022; 35(2):126-130.

PMID: 35391809 PMC: 8982946. DOI: 10.4103/1319-4534.337865.


References
1.
Pinero D, Juan J, Alio J . Intrasubject repeatability of internal aberrometry obtained with a new integrated aberrometer. J Refract Surg. 2010; 27(7):509-17. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20101214-01. View

2.
Chen L, Huang L, Gray B, Chernyak D . Comparison of wavefront aberrations in rabbit and human eyes. Clin Exp Optom. 2014; 97(6):534-9. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12184. View

3.
Hiraoka T, Yamamoto T, Okamoto F, Oshika T . Changes in functional visual acuity and ocular wavefront aberration after administration of eye ointment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 29(8):770-5. DOI: 10.1089/jop.2013.0024. View

4.
Mocko L, Zajac M, Roszkowska A, Weglarz B, Milka M, Dobrowolski D . [Contemporary applications of wavefront aberrometry in ophthalmology practice]. Klin Oczna. 2012; 114(1):75-8. View

5.
Lee S, Chang J . The relationship between higher-order aberrations and amblyopia treatment in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014; 28(1):66-75. PMC: 3913983. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.66. View