» Articles » PMID: 26948183

Twelve-month Discontinuation of Etonogestrel Implant in an Outpatient Pediatric Setting

Overview
Journal Contraception
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Mar 8
PMID 26948183
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant is the most effective reversible contraceptive method. Uptake remains limited in adolescents, a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to determine the 12-month discontinuation rate of the ENG implant among adolescents in an outpatient setting and to characterize risk factors for discontinuation.

Study Design: A retrospective chart review identified adolescent females aged 12 to 22years who received the ENG implant in one pediatric institution between January 1, 2011, and April 15, 2014. Patients were categorized into ENG discontinuers (removed prior to 12months) and ENG continuers (continued for ≥12months). Associations between demographic, clinical and postplacement characteristics with ENG discontinuation category were assessed with t tests, χ(2)/Fisher's Exact Tests and backwards stepwise logistic regression.

Results: Of the 750 patients who had an ENG implant inserted, 77 (10.3%) had the device removed prior to 12months of use. The mean length of implant use for those who discontinued was 7.5months. Problematic bleeding was the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation. Older age at time of insertion, history of pregnancy and ≥1 medical visit for implant concerns (not including removal) were independently predictive (p<.01) of method discontinuation.

Conclusion: The vast majority of adolescents continued the ENG implant at 12months, making it an excellent contraceptive choice for adolescents within the outpatient pediatric setting. Greater efforts should be made to increase its use by pediatric providers.

Implications: The ENG implant is an excellent contraceptive option for adolescents in the outpatient pediatric setting.

Citing Articles

Early removal of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in Spanish women: a prospective cohort study.

Ruiz de Vinaspre-Hernandez R, Garrido-Santamaria R, Urra-Martinez R, Saenz-Cabredo P, Garrido-Rivas A, Juarez-Vela R Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1172793.

PMID: 38323032 PMC: 10844390. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1172793.


Acceptability of telemedicine for follow up after contraceptive implant initiation at an obstetrics and gynecologic training center.

Vatrasresth J, Prapaisilp P, Sukrong M, Sinthuchai N, Karroon P, Maitreechit D BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):817.

PMID: 37525129 PMC: 10391934. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09816-7.


Considerations in Adolescent Use of the Etonogestrel Subdermal Implant: A Cohort Study.

Fei Y, Smith Y, Dendrinos M, Rosen M, Quint E Front Reprod Health. 2022; 3:780902.

PMID: 36304012 PMC: 9580660. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2021.780902.


Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Rocca M, Palumbo A, Visconti F, Carlo C Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(6).

PMID: 34201123 PMC: 8229462. DOI: 10.3390/ph14060548.


Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Hendrick C, Cone J, Cirullo J, Maslowsky J Adolesc Res Rev. 2021; 5(3):243-279.

PMID: 34056060 PMC: 8159026. DOI: 10.1007/s40894-019-00126-w.