» Articles » PMID: 34056060

Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use Among Adolescents in the United States

Overview
Journal Adolesc Res Rev
Date 2021 May 31
PMID 34056060
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has gained attention as a promising strategy for preventing unintended adolescent pregnancies in the United States. However, LARC use among adolescents at risk for pregnancy remains low compared to women in their 20s. The purpose of the current study was to synthesize the empirical literature published between 2010 and 2018 identifying the facilitators of and barriers to adolescents' (< age 20) LARC use in the United States. Thirty quantitative and qualitative studies were included in the current systematic review. The facilitators of and barriers to adolescent LARC use fell within five themes: LARC method characteristics, individual characteristics, social networks, healthcare systems, and historical time and geographical region. Barriers to adolescent LARC use largely echoed those identified in previous research noting the barriers to LARC use among young adult women (e.g., provider concerns with placing IUDs for nulliparous women, common adverse side effects associated with some LARC methods). However, qualitative studies identified adolescents' mothers as central figures in helping adolescents successfully obtain the LARC methods they desired. Conversely, adolescents' partners seemed to only play a minor role in adolescents' contraceptive decisions. Findings within the reviewed studies also suggested some subpopulations of adolescents may be experiencing pressure to initiate LARC use or have less ability to have their LARC device removed if they wish to discontinue use. Adolescent health practitioners and clinicians should consider the unique social-environmental influences of adolescents' contraceptive access and behaviors to best meet adolescents' contraceptive needs and desires.

Citing Articles

Contraception and Reproductive Health Measurement Instruments for Adolescents and Youth: A Scoping Review.

Long M, Xu Q, Xie Y, Ren Y, Zheng Y, Niu C Int J Sex Health. 2024; 36(4):584-596.

PMID: 39552620 PMC: 11562903. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2388262.


How Can We Address What We Do Not Measure? A Systematic Scoping Review of the Measurement and Operationalization of Social Determinants of Health Research on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive among Adolescents in the US.

Poehling C, Downey M, Gwan A, Cannady S, Ismail O Adolescents. 2024; 3(2):240-258.

PMID: 38912095 PMC: 11192542. DOI: 10.3390/adolescents3020018.


Continuation of Reversible Contraception Following Enrollment in the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) in Puerto Rico, 2016-2020.

Zapata L, Kortsmit K, Curtis K, Romero L, Hurst S, Lathrop E Stud Fam Plann. 2024; 55(2):105-125.

PMID: 38659169 PMC: 11299421. DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12262.


Early removal of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in Spanish women: a prospective cohort study.

Ruiz de Vinaspre-Hernandez R, Garrido-Santamaria R, Urra-Martinez R, Saenz-Cabredo P, Garrido-Rivas A, Juarez-Vela R Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1172793.

PMID: 38323032 PMC: 10844390. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1172793.


Contraceptive use among sexually active female adolescents in Ethiopia: trends and determinants from national demographic and health surveys.

Olika A, Kitila S, Biratu Terfa Y, Olika A Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1):104.

PMID: 34034741 PMC: 8146240. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01161-4.

References
1.
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J . Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011; 84(5):493-8. PMC: 3505875. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. View

2.
Wilson S, Degaiffier N, Ratcliffe S, Schreiber C . Peer counselling for the promotion of long-acting, reversible contraception among teens: a randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016; 21(5):380-7. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1214698. View

3.
Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G . Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services—United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64(13):363-9. PMC: 4584628. View

4.
Lindberg L, Santelli J, Desai S . Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012. J Adolesc Health. 2016; 59(5):577-583. PMC: 5498007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.024. View

5.
Reddy D, Fleming R, Swain C . Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA. 2002; 288(6):710-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.6.710. View