» Articles » PMID: 26945096

Local and Systemic Factors and Implantation: What is the Evidence?

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2016 Mar 6
PMID 26945096
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant progress has been made in the understanding of embryonic competence and endometrial receptivity since the inception of assisted reproductive technology. The endometrium is a highly dynamic tissue that plays a crucial role in the establishment and maintenance of normal pregnancy. In response to steroid sex hormones, the endometrium undergoes marked changes during the menstrual cycle that are critical for acceptance of the nascent embryo. There is also a wide body of literature on systemic factors that impact assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Patient prognosis is impacted by an array of factors that tip the scales in her favor or against success. Recognizing the local and systemic factors will allow clinicians to better understand and optimize the maternal environment at the time of implantation. This review will address the current literature on endometrial and systemic factors related to impaired implantation and highlight recent advances in this area of reproductive medicine.

Citing Articles

GRB2 regulation of essential signaling pathways in the endometrium is critical for implantation and decidualization.

Tran D, Hwang Y, Kim K, Li R, Marquardt R, Chen C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2192.

PMID: 40038241 PMC: 11880417. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57173-2.


The use of propensity score matching to assess the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure.

Yu S, Zhang Y, Li N, Su Z, Li W, Lou H Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1402575.

PMID: 39872313 PMC: 11769791. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1402575.


Ethanol Sclerotherapy for Endometriomas in Infertile Women: A Narrative Review.

Sukur Y, Aslan B, Varli B, Ozcan P, Daniilidis A, Kalaitzopoulos D J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768471 PMC: 11727901. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247548.


The value of G-CSF in women experienced at least one implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Su Q, Pan Z, Yin R, Li X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1370114.

PMID: 38694938 PMC: 11061619. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1370114.


The impact of estradiol supplementation on endometrial thickness and intrauterine insemination outcomes.

Zhang W, McCracken M, Dominguez L, Zhang A, Johal J, Aghajanova L Reprod Biol. 2024; 24(2):100886.

PMID: 38636264 PMC: 11208072. DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100886.


References
1.
Noyes R, Hertig A, Rock J . Reprint of: Dating the Endometrial Biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(4 Suppl1):e93-e115. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.079. View

2.
Harton G, Munne S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh D . Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100(6):1695-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.2002. View

3.
Takebayashi A, Kimura F, Kishi Y, Ishida M, Takahashi A, Yamanaka A . The association between endometriosis and chronic endometritis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e88354. PMC: 3928198. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088354. View

4.
Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Simon C . Transcriptomics of the human endometrium. Int J Dev Biol. 2014; 58(2-4):127-37. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.130340pd. View

5.
Wu M, Lu C, Chuang P, Tsai S . Prostaglandin E2: the master of endometriosis?. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010; 235(6):668-77. DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2010.009321. View